Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
2 | JENKINS Ryan J. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 23% | 75% |
3 | JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
3 | YUN Joy | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
5 | BURKE Nora S. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
6 | HIRSCH Sydney R. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
7 | LINDER Kara E. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 38% |
8 | THEODORE Maria A. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
9 | GOUHIN Chloe | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
9 | MILLER Sky | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 69% |
11 | AVAKIAN Mikaela | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
12 | JOHNSON Honor B. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 80% |
13 | KONG Vera | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
14 | DI PERNA Chiara I. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 43% | 21% |
15 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | - | - | 1% | 5% | 27% | 55% | 12% |
16 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
17 | HARRILL Gillian N. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
18 | WOZNIAK Kelli | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
19 | KIM Zoe | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
20 | MOYA Keona L. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
21 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
22 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
23 | FAHRI Monir J. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
23 | LIANG Megan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 40% | 10% |
25 | SHEA Erin | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
26 | YONG Annika A. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% |
27 | NGUYEN Thea | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
28 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 36% | 38% | 9% |
29 | HUNTER Nina B. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
30 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 35% |
31 | LI Anna M. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 3% |
32 | WANG Caroline Y. | - | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
33 | WHANG Rebecca | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
34 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
35 | TIMOFEYEV Daniella | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 45% | 40% |
36 | SEHIC Cassandra | 1% | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
37 | HANADARI-LEVY Amit | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
38 | WITEK Sophie B. | - | 1% | 7% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
39 | SHEALY Maggie | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 4% |
40 | HARRISON Imogen N. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
41 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 46% | 21% |
42 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% |
43 | SONG Robyn | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
44 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
45 | CHERNOMORSKY Maria | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
46 | REDDY Shreya | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
47 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
48 | KOVACS Sophia | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
49 | CAO Stephanie X. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
50 | LU Vivian Y. | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
51 | TANG Catherine H. | 1% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
52 | PARKER Abigale B. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
53 | OISHI Megumi | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 10% |
54 | HOFFMAN Ilsa L. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
55 | ALLUM Isabel (Izzy) T. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
56 | WU Erica L. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
57 | IYER Mohini R. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
58 | TURNER Zoe Y. | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
59 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
60 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 13% |
61 | WHITE Amber L. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 23% |
62 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
63 | KOZAK Sonja A. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
64 | SONG Jenny | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
65 | IZENSON Lark (Keli) (Lark) | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
66 | YONG Erika E. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
67 | ROH Rachel E. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 13% |
68 | LACSON Sarah | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
69 | PINCUS Lucy Y. | - | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
70 | SZETO Chloe | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
71 | BLUM Leah I. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
72 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
73 | STONE Hava S. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
74 | HONE Katarina G. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
75 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
76 | TZOU Alexandra | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
77 | GULATI Ria | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
78 | MATAIEV Natalie S. | 2% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
78 | LARIMER Katherine E. | 2% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
80 | TAO Hannah J. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
81 | HILADO Sarah | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
82 | SCHMITT Alana P. | 5% | 32% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
83 | TIBURCIO Diana | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
84 | TONG Kunling | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
85 | FLOREZ Melissa | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
86 | TANG Annie L. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
87 | YAP Madeline | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
88 | CHAN Audrey | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
89 | PINCUS Emma Y. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
89 | TUCKER Iman R. | 1% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
91 | CHANG Josephine S. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
92 | DESAI Maya D. | 6% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
92 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
94 | MILLER Mattea K. | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
94 | KIM Catherine | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
96 | CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
97 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
97 | FAUCHER Erin | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
97 | BECCHINA Bridget F. | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
100 | KALRA Siya L. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
101 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
102 | JULIEN Michelle | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
103 | CASHMAN Natalie | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 4% | - |
104 | VALADEZ Emily T. | - | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
105 | PATEL Riya | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
106 | FEARNS Zara A. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
107 | KRYLOVA Valery | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
107 | BAE EMMELINE | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
109 | CHIN Erika J. | 1% | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
110 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
111 | CHEN Erica | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
112 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 2% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
113 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
114 | LI Victoria J. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
115 | BERMAN Stella | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
116 | DODRILL Brooke | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
117 | SUNGA Arabella Krystienne M. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
118 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
119 | BURCH Makana Y. | 1% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
120 | LIU Rachel | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
121 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
122 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
123 | KALRA Himani V. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
124 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
124 | CHANG Emily | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
126 | CANNON Sophia E. | - | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
127 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
128 | PARKER Allegra H. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
129 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
130 | WOLFSON Elizabeth | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
131 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
132 | CHEEMA Sophia | - | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
132 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
134 | YANG Kaitlyn H. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
135 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
136 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 11% | 35% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
137 | KIM Emily | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
138 | LIMB Madeline I. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
138 | KOBERSTEIN Maggie | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
140 | BROWN Emma | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
141 | BIENVENU Camille C. | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
141 | BENTOLILA Yedida | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
143 | HE Charlotte | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
144 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
145 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
146 | XU Ellen | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
147 | WEBER Juliana I. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
148 | KONG Isabel | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
149 | DRAGON Rainer | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
150 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 10% | - |
151 | PETE Gillian C. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
152 | MORAN Emma | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
153 | MORAGA Christiana | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
154 | MARSEE Samantha | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
155 | GEYER Carolina M. | 5% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
156 | FOX-GITOMER Francesca M. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
156 | HAYES Grace Y. | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
158 | RANSON Margaux | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
159 | BALMASEDA Sabrina F. | 3% | 42% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
159 | VAN ATTA Grace Y. | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
161 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
162 | THROWER Lola S. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
163 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
164 | DARINGA Arianna | - | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
165 | BEALE Zoe M. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
166 | PRAXL Alexa R. | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
167 | KALEEL Caroline | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
168 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 11% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
168 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
168 | RHIE Lena | 14% | 48% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
171 | NOVICK Mia J. | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
171 | NOBREGA Carolina S. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
173 | ZUO Xiaofan | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
173 | HAN Lauren | 32% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
175 | LIM Isabel K. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
176 | BATRA Simran | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
177 | XI Shining | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
178 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 1% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
179 | KATZ Anat | < 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | - |
180 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
181 | ANGKAVANICH Anna | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
182 | ROBINSON Stella | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
183 | KIM Sujin | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
184 | RANGANATHAN Ruchi | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
185 | FAY Zoe A. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
186 | KATZE Ashley | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
186 | BHOGAL Sukhleen | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
188 | MACDONALD Kaylie S. | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
188 | FAUSTINO Emily | 98% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
190 | BOWDEN Ms Hope A. | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
190 | FREEDMAN Amelia F. | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
192 | GRIFFIN Afwe | 35% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
193 | WHEELER Kira | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
193 | GUZMAN Claudia | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
195 | CHARLES Caitlin | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
196 | BODILY Grace | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.