Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HUAI Delilah | - | - | 4% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
| 2 | YAM Danika | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 3 | NGUYEN Siena | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
| 3 | DANG Kelia | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% |
| 5 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 6 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 7 | GRULICH Rayaana | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 8 | YAO Rainie | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 9 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | - | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
| 10 | LO Chloe | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 11 | HITOMI Nadya | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 12 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 13 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 14 | WILSON Eva | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | LIU Sydney | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% |
| 16 | BORDAS HILL Georgiana | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 17 | KANG Ellie | 2% | 10% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 19 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | CHO Michelle | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 21 | DUDNICK Morgan | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 22 | SAAD Alia | 12% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 23 | BROCK Sydney | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 3% |
| 24 | ZHAI Amy | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 25 | SHEARER Alena | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 26 | STONE Coral | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
| 27 | CHEN Elaine | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | LOMOTAN Addison | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | LI Ying Chu | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 30 | GOMES Diana C. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 31 | WANG Peijia | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 32 | LIN Annika | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | LEE Irene | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | HAN Emma | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | JEFFORDS Sophia | - | 10% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 36 | KIM Elyssa | 5% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LIU Hannah | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 38 | AMELANG Raquel | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | JENSEN Katrina | 6% | 42% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | LIN Yeeann | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | LI Sonia | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | QURESHI Alesha | 74% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.