American Challenge RJCC/RYC

Youth 10 Men’s Foil (Y10MF)

Friday, April 17, 2026 at 1:00 PM

Register

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1808 1930 - 1698
5 - 8 1622 1742 - 1541
9 - 16 1334 1608 - 1095
17 - 29 1260 2500 - 723

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Cao, Aaron 5T Fencers Club U 1930 1667.11
2 Huang, Dalynn East Coast Fencing Club E25 1897 1643.79
3 Zhang, Eric Star Fencing Academy E26 1698 1442.37
4 Yoon, Mason Fencers Club Inc. U 1706 1429.83
5 Shen, Lawrence Star Fencing Academy U 1742 1384.19
6 Xia, Wenhao Star Fencing Academy U 1630 1346.89
7 Tardiff, Owen Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) U 1577 1309.08
8 Moon, Nolan Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) U 1541 1278.45
9 Yu, Oliver Gutkovskiy Fencing Academy U 1608 1253.60
10 Lu, Ethan Star Fencing Academy U 1376 1076.21
11 Stark, Ethan Star Fencing Academy U 1413 1028.81
12 Wu, Yulen Star Fencing Academy U 1303 1012.86
13 Ho, Marcus Mid-Island Fencing Academy U 1354 970.00
14 Xiong, Jeffrey Star Fencing Academy U 1348 940.30
15 Li, Ethan Gold Fencing Club U 1095 785.16
16 Zhang, Andrew Star Fencing Academy U 1173 743.34
17 KIM, ISAAC Top Fencing Club U 1120 714.77
18 LIU, KUNDE Star Fencing Academy U 1186 680.08
19 Del Valle-Lin, Julian Fencers Club Inc. U 1069 571.30
20 KIM, JOSHUA Top Fencing Club U 978 545.11
21 Xiong, David Star Fencing Academy U 1052 536.01
22 Sun, Neil Star Fencing Academy U 956 529.02
23 Weng, Jingfan Star Fencing Academy U 740 67.00
24 Lee, Matthias Top Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
25 Yang, Robert 5T Fencers Club U 2079 < 0
26 sha, Adam Brooklyn Fencing Center U 1497 < 0
27 Khalikov, Michael FitFence Club U 723 < 0
28 Choi, Joshua Gutkovskiy Fencing Academy U 1704 < 0
29 Zhao, Ethan Star Fencing Academy U 781 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!