Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 2 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
| 3 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% | |
| 3 | LI Yiwei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
| 5 | CHOI Silas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 6 | TAO Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 7 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% | 4% |
| 8 | COOK Cole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 21% | |
| 9 | JOO Jeein | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% |
| 10 | BYON Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 5% |
| 11 | CHEONG Heonjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% | |
| 12 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 13 | KANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 14 | HERRERA Aragon | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 15 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | 3% | |
| 16 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
| 17 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | |
| 18 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 5% | < 1% | |
| 19 | YAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 7% |
| 20 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 21 | LEE Noah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 22 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
| 23 | LI Howard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
| 24 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | 100% | 92% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | BARRIOS Diego | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | 2% | |
| 26 | TSE Aiden | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 27 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 28 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | |
| 29 | GAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% | |
| 30 | YU Casey | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | PATRICO Peter | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 32 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
| 33 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | LESUEUR Luke J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
| 35 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% |
| 36 | RICHARDS Corey | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 37 | SOWERS Samuel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 38 | LEIGH Edward | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | ROSS Dash S. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 40 | SILVA Joaquin | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | WANG HongXi | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | WANG Weiyun | 100% | 98% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | BUI Joseph | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | POLEYUMPTEWA Connor | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 45 | WEINBERG Harry | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | GAY Jono | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 47 | IYER Neil | 100% | 79% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | ZENG Vito | 100% | 91% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | LI Yidong A. | 100% | 94% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | CHAN Elliott | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 52 | SUNG Julian | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 53 | COPELAND Jackson | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 54 | JOHNSON Kai | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | SINGHAL Armaan | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | KORCH Kamillo | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | LIU Yijin | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 58 | BRIMMER Robert (Trey) | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.