Portland ROC

Veteran Men’s Epee (VETME)

Friday, March 20, 2026 at 4:00 PM

Register

Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3025 3313 - 2820
5 - 8 2618 3027 - 2184
9 - 16 1937 2110 - 1790
17 - 28 1581 2206 - 1121

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Sprowles, Cameron Salle Auriol Seattle A26 3313 2998.47
2 Cranor, Erich Northwest Fencing Center A25 3142 2871.80
3 Krogh, Daniel Northwest Fencing Center A26 2825 2467.63
4 Baxter, Daniel Northwest Fencing Center B25 2820 2461.15
5 Lake, Adam Eugene Fencers Club C22 3027 2135.75
6 Clinefelter, Dennis Northwest Fencing Center C24 2353 2001.46
7 Moreno Briones, Patricio Northwest Fencing Center C25 2908 1902.79
8 Kryltsov, Greg Rain City Fencing Center B24 2184 1870.10
9 Reed, David Rain City Fencing Center C25 1919 1618.82
10 King, Richard Northwest Fencing Center C23 1995 1591.06
11 Barna, Randall High Desert Fencing Club U 2110 1493.88
12 Ellington, Jeff High Desert Fencing Club U 1819 1240.46
13 Giller, Irving Northwest Fencing Center E26 2000 1237.71
14 Hoopes, Richard D25 1808 1086.70
15 Bray, Bruce Orion Fencing D25 1790 1011.76
16 Zhang, Zhiyu Northwest Fencing Center U 2055 906.20
17 Dan, Chuntao Kaizen Academy LLC E22 1363 794.38
18 Gandour-Rood, Elliott Metro Tacoma Fencing Club U 1656 749.35
19 Clifton, Kenneth Metro Tacoma Fencing Club E25 1600 725.55
20 Cho, Hans Battle Born Fencing Club U 1596 678.59
21 Hartranft, Scott Northwest Fencing Center U 1533 647.88
22 Ge, Liang Rain City Fencing Center U 1290 618.78
23 Baldwin, Seth Northwest Fencing Center D24 1999 450.13
24 Petersen, Aaron Metro Tacoma Fencing Club U 1221 432.92
25 Johnson, Brian Metro Tacoma Fencing Club U 1297 318.36
26 Babcock, James Northwest Fencing Center U 1121 307.07
27 Heberling, John Eugene Fencers Club U 2206 130.49
28 Hoopes, Richard U 2093 102.69

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!