Portland RJCC

Cadet Men’s Epee (CDTME)

Saturday, April 11, 2026 at 1:00 PM

Register

Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2345 2756 - 2141
5 - 8 2010 2044 - 1929
9 - 16 1791 2005 - 1605
17 - 27 1427 1792 - 1124

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lu, Jacob Kaizen Academy LLC A25 2756 2495.44
2 Zhang, Albert Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. A26 2311 2018.19
3 Lewis, Michael Rain City Fencing Center B25 2173 1913.45
4 Gowda, Suyog Northwest Fencing Center B25 2141 1875.54
5 Zhang, Chaoyi（Joey） Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C26 2041 1774.63
6 Li, Timothy Kaizen Academy LLC B25 2028 1766.53
7 wang, aaron Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C26 2044 1764.62
8 Zhang, Austin B25 1929 1631.76
9 St Clair, Soren Northwest Fencing Center C26 1896 1608.37
10 Toyofuku, Lucas Olympic Epee Masters C25 2005 1574.68
11 Myrah, Devin Kaizen Academy LLC D25 1842 1574.25
12 Kim, Remington LA International Fencing B25 1800 1548.21
13 Lu, Ian Kaizen Academy LLC E25 1769 1505.69
14 Ma, Nolan Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E25 1746 1467.59
15 Wang, Juehan Rain City Fencing Center E26 1668 1373.92
16 Chen, Christopher Olympic Epee Masters E25 1605 1313.45
17 Breiling, Sebastian Northwest Fencing Center D25 1655 1295.07
18 Nguyen, Ethan V. San Diego Fencing Center E25 1567 1268.98
19 Ramirez, Hunter Kaizen Academy LLC D25 1589 1229.22
20 Ramirez, Tristan Kaizen Academy LLC E25 1575 1225.04
21 Casoni, Calder Northwest Fencing Center E26 1442 836.34
22 Chan, Joseph Olympic Epee Masters U 1240 720.91
23 Patel, Krish Northwest Fencing Center U 1124 626.43
24 Brubaker, Silas Northwest Fencing Center U 1382 567.01
25 Parikh, Parth Northwest Fencing Center U 1165 296.70
26 Ortmann, Noah Elite Zone Fencing Academy U 1792 195.85
27 Deepak, Advait Kaizen Academy LLC U 1168 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!