Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | ATTIA Jasmine | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 2 | GUVEN Coco | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 16% |
| 3 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% |
| 3 | LAURI Keira | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 5 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 18% |
| 6 | ZENG Sarah | - | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 40% |
| 7 | RANJAN Diya | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 8 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 9 | KNOBEL Sophia | - | - | 4% | 23% | 48% | 24% |
| 10 | HU Anna | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 11 | LEOU Korina | - | 4% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% |
| 12 | CHAVAN Arya | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 13% |
| 13 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 14 | LIU Yifei | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 15 | KHOST Maeve | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 16 | GONG Joy | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 17 | BUSH Bethany | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
| 18 | LEE Alyson | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 19 | VINOKUR Anita | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 20 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 21 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% |
| 22 | CHIANG Melissa | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 23 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 24 | BERMAN greta | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 25 | AWAD Royce | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | MALEK Zolie | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 27 | WENG Amber | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 28 | MAK Kaitlin | 3% | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 29 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 30 | BORGUETA Madison | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | LEE Kaitlin | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 32 | GUGALA Hanna | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 33 | LOO Kaitlyn | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 34 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 1% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 4% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 36 | RIFKIN Lielle | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | KWON Ava | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 38 | CHI Claire | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
| 39 | WANG Jiayi | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 39 | KIM Audrey | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 41 | FOSS Persephone | 2% | 16% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | LEE Kaelyn | 35% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | CHOI Charlotte | 21% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | GONZALEZ Veronika | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 46 | KWON Ava | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 47 | WANG JiaQi | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 48 | MEYERSON Michelle | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 2% |
| 49 | WONG Charlene | 21% | 45% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | YOON Sela | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | CASTELO Soleil | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 52 | MACKAY Katherine | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 53 | GENTILE Vittoria | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 54 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 55 | NIU Jessica | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% | 2% |
| 56 | BIBLER Anna | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 57 | MANSPERGER Gia | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 58 | JUILLERAT Elina | 17% | 48% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 59 | REKHTMAN Alice | 27% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | FUNG Iris | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 61 | LEIGH Adalene | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 61 | BROWN Aria | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 63 | ZHU Avril | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 64 | YAO Annabelle | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 65 | KONNIKOV Esther E. | 53% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | YUN Madison | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.