Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NYKAMP Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 13% |
| 2 | CLAYPOOL Conner | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% | |
| 3 | GOSMEYER Matthew E. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 3 | LEYLAND John | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 5 | GERACI Paul A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 6 | KELBLEY Newt J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 32% | 6% | |
| 7 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% |
| 8 | BAKKE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | HAAS Zane | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 10 | CHRISTIAN John R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | KOZINSKI Allison E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 1% |
| 12 | PRIJATEL John R. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 13 | DVORAK Ryan | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | DEMOSS Mercedes | 100% | 86% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 15 | DEMOSS Sophia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 16 | BERNWANGER Phillip | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 17 | ACKLEY Elijah | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 18 | GOULD Justin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | - |
| 19 | BAILEY Lauren | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 20 | OWENS Josiah | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.