Nashville Challenge RYC/RJCC

Cadet Men’s Foil (CDTMF)

Saturday, February 21, 2026 at 2:30 PM

Register

MTSU Campus Recreation - Murfreesboro, TN

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2103 2441 - 1854
5 - 8 1732 1836 - 1663
9 - 16 1390 1583 - 1085
17 - 24 1575 2500 - 527

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 LIM, EUNSEONG Auburn Fencing Club C26 2441 2177.34
2 Huynh, Matthew Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. C26 2228 1971.19
3 Danton, Ryan Masters Fencing Club E25 1888 1621.76
4 Qian, Henry Epic Fencing Club U 1854 1601.09
5 You, Chanmin Lotus Fencing Academy C25 1836 1526.23
6 Alanazi, Saif Fencing TN Alliance U 1729 1398.78
7 Nemi, Vin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1702 1385.52
8 Karlekar, Ved Nashville Elite Fencing Club D25 1663 1335.81
9 Huynh, Kaleb Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. D26 1583 1332.90
10 Robertson, Liam Birmingham Fencing Club U 1471 1133.89
11 Park, Jubin Nashville Elite Fencing Club E26 1441 1114.16
12 Sun, Ethan Epic Fencing Club U 1583 1075.44
13 Morrison, Archer Salle D'Armes Bosco U 1258 750.33
14 Dalal, Amitav Orlando Fencing Academy U 1138 701.25
15 Brown, Jackson Atlanta Fencers Club Foundation Inc. U 1560 602.91
16 Patel, Aarav Birmingham Fencing Club U 1085 420.57
17 Liang, Andrew Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1204 407.60
18 DeCastro, Evan Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1377 348.53
19 Brittingham, Henry Atlanta Fencers Club Foundation Inc. U 1349 195.49
20 Cunningham, Cameron Fencing TN Alliance U 2500 < 0
21 Kim, Ryan Epic Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
22 Krakauer, Alex Fencing TN Alliance U 2500 < 0
23 Hu, Alexander Epic Fencing Club U 644 < 0
24 Chen, Tyler Orlando Fencing Academy U 527 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!