Nashville Challenge RYC/RJCC

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Sunday, February 22, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Register

MTSU Campus Recreation - Murfreesboro, TN

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2176 2488 - 1883
5 - 8 1826 1890 - 1741
9 - 16 1445 1711 - 1154
17 - 24 1166 1803 - 517

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 LIM, EUNSEONG Birmingham Fencing Club C26 2488 2221.52
2 Huynh, Matthew Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. C26 2244 1985.76
3 Marisi, Gabriel Bluegrass Fencers' Club C26 2087 1833.05
4 Qian, Henry Epic Fencing Club D26 1883 1627.79
5 You, Chanmin Lotus Fencing Academy C25 1858 1556.36
6 Harkins, Asher Lotus Fencing Academy C25 1890 1547.68
7 Cao, Kellen Lotus Fencing Academy D25 1814 1490.70
8 Ramesh, Prashvin Apex Fencing Academy D25 1741 1449.08
9 Alanazi, Saif Fencing TN Alliance U 1711 1388.53
10 Karlekar, Ved Nashville Elite Fencing Club D25 1639 1316.46
11 Park, Jubin Nashville Elite Fencing Club E26 1490 1172.68
12 Robertson, Liam Birmingham Fencing Club U 1455 1126.98
13 Liu, Runze Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1501 991.50
14 Schwartz, David Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1372 842.82
15 Dalal, Amitav Orlando Fencing Academy U 1154 726.86
16 Bridges, Harrison Birmingham Fencing Club U 1237 521.92
17 Patel, Aarav Birmingham Fencing Club U 1057 470.36
18 Hoover, Greyson Fencing TN Alliance U 1657 394.20
19 Krakauer, Alex Fencing TN Alliance U 1803 254.09
20 Cunningham, Cameron Fencing TN Alliance U 1550 92.54
21 Hu, Alexander Epic Fencing Club U 617 < 0
22 Chen, Tyler Orlando Fencing Academy U 517 < 0
23 Manna, Eshaan U 1063 < 0
24 Battiwalla, Rohan Fencing TN Alliance U 1060 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!