Mid-South Fencers Club - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | LANG Markus | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 2 | COHEN Jared E. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% | |
| 3 | ANDERSON Scott G. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 3 | HANSEN Lars | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 57% | 14% |
| 5 | RICHARDS Huw | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 6 | O’DEA Anthony | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 7 | AMOROSO John | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
| 8 | POWERS Bill | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% | |
| 9 | STUBBLEFIELD Alexander | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 10 | PRIOLEAU Isabel | 100% | 96% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 11 | ZOOK Evan D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 12 | FOREST Sung | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% |
| 13 | COMBS Colson | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 14 | STUBBLEFIELD Evan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 22% | 2% |
| 15 | BROWN Joshua (Josh) A. | 100% | 91% | 53% | 15% | 1% | |
| 16 | WHITTEN Daniel | 100% | 91% | 45% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | CLAPP Ian | 100% | 98% | 74% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 19 | LEE Hunter | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 20 | LOCKWOOD Ben F. | 100% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
| 21 | HOU Phi | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 22 | PREUD'HOMME Xavier A. | 100% | 73% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 23 | SPIELBERG Joel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 19% | 2% |
| 24 | CILENTI Maria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
| 25 | LILLISTON Ian | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | OTERO Dante | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 29 | JULIEN Erica | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.