Nashville Challenge RYC/RJCC

Junior Women’s Epee (JNRWE)

Sunday, February 22, 2026 at 12:00 PM

Register

MTSU Campus Recreation - Murfreesboro, TN

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2034 2183 - 1715
5 - 8 1656 1777 - 1574
9 - 16 1340 1713 - 1111
17 - 27 1810 2500 - 866

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kindel, Amara Fencing Club Asheville E23 2176 1800.82
2 Liu, Elinda Olympic Fencers Club C24 2062 1628.70
3 Marisi, Gianna Bluegrass Fencers' Club C25 2183 1575.33
4 Jiang, Alexandra Elite Fencing Academy D25 1715 1341.66
5 Bergan, Bailey Nova Fencing Club U 1777 1302.40
6 KWON, Claire Virginia Apex Fencing Club D25 1599 1298.57
7 Ng, Allie Olympic Fencers Club U 1675 1165.14
8 Teitenberg, Elise Nashville Academy of Fencing E25 1574 997.48
9 Drewry, Alexandra Nashville Academy of Fencing U 1713 974.86
10 Kwon, Allison Virginia Apex Fencing Club U 1281 903.41
11 Acosta, Mei Olympic Fencers Club U 1452 845.43
12 Napoli, Eleanor Elite Fencing Academy E24 1144 814.12
13 Desai, Mallika Olympic Fencers Club E24 1457 795.13
14 Brindavan, Vyahriti Pegasus Sword Academy Inc. U 1111 720.51
15 Porter, Cora Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1297 719.90
16 Guler, Ayse Elite Fencing Academy U 1262 619.22
17 Gochberg, Madeline Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1091 606.03
18 Ilyas, Lyla Elite Fencing Academy U 866 253.02
19 Joseph, JoAnn Olympic Fencers Club U 1838 236.58
20 Yin, Ellen Olympic Fencers Club U 1502 225.97
21 Chanda, Samyuktha Olympic Fencers Club U 2500 < 0
22 Kang, Dah yeon Olympic Fencers Club U 2500 < 0
23 Peters, Joelle Olympic Fencers Club U 2500 < 0
24 Joshi, Zara Olympic Fencers Club U 2500 < 0
25 Schwartz, Sophie Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
26 Zhang, Elaine Olympic Fencers Club U 1165 < 0
27 Koh, Millicent Olympic Fencers Club U 951 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!