Nashville Challenge RYC/RJCC

Junior Women’s Epee (JNRWE)

Sunday, February 22, 2026 at 12:00 PM

Register

MTSU Campus Recreation - Murfreesboro, TN

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2059 2206 - 1803
5 - 8 1681 1796 - 1582
9 - 16 1344 1713 - 1137
17 - 27 1339 1888 - 872

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kindel, Amara Fencing Club Asheville E23 2176 1800.82
2 Marisi, Gianna Bluegrass Fencers' Club C25 2206 1646.72
3 Liu, Elinda Olympic Fencers Club C24 2050 1626.69
4 Jiang, Alexandra Elite Fencing Academy D26 1803 1458.89
5 Bergan, Bailey Nova Fencing Club U 1796 1357.16
6 Teitenberg, Elise Nashville Academy of Fencing E26 1760 1298.58
7 KWON, Claire Virginia Apex Fencing Club D25 1582 1287.39
8 Ng, Allie Olympic Fencers Club U 1585 1122.37
9 Kwon, Allison Virginia Apex Fencing Club U 1343 988.01
10 Drewry, Alexandra Nashville Academy of Fencing U 1713 974.86
11 Acosta, Mei Olympic Fencers Club U 1388 841.67
12 Napoli, Eleanor Elite Fencing Academy E24 1167 841.14
13 Desai, Mallika Olympic Fencers Club E24 1458 836.21
14 Porter, Cora Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1328 810.64
15 Gochberg, Madeline Nashville Elite Fencing Club E26 1216 771.84
16 Brindavan, Vyahriti Pegasus Sword Academy Inc. U 1137 759.52
17 Guler, Ayse Elite Fencing Academy U 1296 722.02
18 Ilyas, Lyla Elite Fencing Academy U 1034 507.66
19 Yin, Ellen Olympic Fencers Club U 1309 423.89
20 Peters, Joelle Olympic Fencers Club E26 1881 341.50
21 Schwartz, Sophie Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1575 283.85
22 Chanda, Samyuktha Olympic Fencers Club U 1888 183.65
23 Kang, Dah yeon Olympic Fencers Club U 1365 158.28
24 Joseph, JoAnn Olympic Fencers Club U 1454 117.04
25 Koh, Millicent Olympic Fencers Club U 930 < 0
26 Zhang, Elaine Olympic Fencers Club U 872 < 0
27 Joshi, Zara Olympic Fencers Club U 1126 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!