Nashville Challenge RYC/RJCC

Youth 14 Men’s Foil (Y14MF)

Sunday, February 22, 2026 at 1:00 PM

Register

MTSU Campus Recreation - Murfreesboro, TN

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1978 2441 - 1729
5 - 8 1545 1702 - 1383
9 - 16 1492 2208 - 1138
17 - 28 1686 2500 - 981

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 LIM, EUNSEONG Auburn Fencing Club C26 2441 2177.34
2 Danton, Ryan Masters Fencing Club E25 1888 1621.76
3 Qian, Henry Epic Fencing Club U 1854 1601.09
4 Alanazi, Saif Fencing TN Alliance U 1729 1398.78
5 Nemi, Vin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1702 1385.52
6 Hoffman, Zane Auburn Fencing Club U 1623 1339.86
7 Robertson, Liam Birmingham Fencing Club U 1471 1133.89
8 Hoare, Gabriel Masters Fencing Club U 1383 1098.71
9 Sun, Ethan Epic Fencing Club U 1583 1075.44
10 Liu, Runze Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1453 934.71
11 JI, SEAN Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 2208 818.88
12 Morrison, Archer Salle D'Armes Bosco U 1258 750.33
13 Dalal, Amitav Orlando Fencing Academy U 1138 701.25
14 Han, Edison Epic Fencing Club U 1513 682.28
15 Hu, Anthony Epic Fencing Club U 1226 648.96
16 Brown, Jackson Atlanta Fencers Club Foundation Inc. U 1560 602.91
17 Choe, Austin Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 981 464.31
18 Patel, Aarav Birmingham Fencing Club U 1085 420.57
19 Liang, Andrew Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1204 407.60
20 Ford, Lennox Birmingham Fencing Club U 1070 386.51
21 DeCastro, Evan Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1377 348.53
22 Brittingham, Henry Atlanta Fencers Club Foundation Inc. U 1349 195.49
23 Richardson, Christopher Phoenix Birmingham Fencing Club U 1625 129.67
24 Kim, Ryan Epic Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
25 Reed, Samuel Oxford Park U 2500 < 0
26 Chavali, Arjun Epic Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
27 Lindley, Patrick Fencing TN Alliance U 2500 < 0
28 Coleman, Hirsch Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1538 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!