Absolute Clash SYC/RJCC

Youth 8 Men’s Saber (Y8MS)

Friday, March 27, 2026 at 10:30 AM

Register

Atlantic City Convention Center - Atlantic City, NJ

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1715 1890 - 1470
5 - 8 1620 2164 - 1269
9 - 16 1643 2047 - 1067
17 - 27 1763 2500 - 544

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Khanna, Ronak Boston Fencing Club U 1890 1294.35
2 Ali, Zidane Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1877 1247.93
3 Ciecierega, Michael Manhattan Fencing Center U 1624 1150.93
4 Wang, Thomas Charlotte Sabers Fencing Academy U 1470 1098.73
5 Tardiff, Finn Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1556 1088.49
6 Vedula, Anay Scarsdale Fencing Center U 2164 993.93
7 Choi, Hudson Allegro Fencing Center U 1493 869.01
8 Chang, Isaac Capital Fencing Academy U 1269 727.93
9 Voss, Benjamin Manhattan Fencing Center U 1797 710.35
10 Zhang, Lucas Rochester Fencing Club U 2047 704.04
11 Youn, James Manhattan Fencing of Englewood U 1771 677.31
12 Sohn, William Brooklyn Bridge Fencing Club U 1582 621.21
13 Ferraro, Marco Capital Fencing Academy U 1067 362.16
14 Zou, Edmund Rochester Fencing Club U 1680 337.96
15 Carino, Phineas Cobra Fencing Club LLC U 1679 275.52
16 Tang, Andy Aura Fencing Academy U 1521 239.86
17 Kong, Louis Manhattan Fencing Center U 1207 107.90
18 Balakumar, Kedar Cobra Fencing Club LLC U 2500 < 0
19 GUPTA, PRANAV Cobra Fencing Club LLC U 2500 < 0
20 Awasthi, Vivaan Cobra Fencing Club LLC U 2500 < 0
21 Xiao, Lucas Z1 Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
22 Lu, Ethan Titan Fencing Academy U 2079 < 0
23 Petrosyan, Maxim Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1055 < 0
24 Prendingue, Ethan Nova Fencing Club U 1759 < 0
25 Ghim, Ian Charlotte Sabers Fencing Academy U 544 < 0
26 Zou, Edwin Rochester Fencing Club U 1355 < 0
27 Daniels, Tyce Allegro Fencing Center U 1396 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!