Absolute Clash SYC/RJCC

Youth 12 Women’s Saber (Y12WS)

Saturday, March 28, 2026 at 3:30 PM

Register

Atlantic City Convention Center - Atlantic City, NJ

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2093 2292 - 2007
5 - 8 1768 1842 - 1700
9 - 16 1643 1756 - 1444
17 - 25 1297 1470 - 1139

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Osminkina-Jones, Kai Manhattan Fencing Center C25 2292 2037.21
2 Maluki, Nia Tim Morehouse Fencing Club E25 2058 1782.71
3 Lamtan, Trinity Manhattan Fencing Center U 2007 1738.14
4 Daniels, Jordanna Allegro Fencing Center E25 2014 1730.03
5 Chen, Chloe Z1 Fencing Club U 1791 1536.37
6 Kong, Hermione Manhattan Fencing Center U 1842 1530.94
7 Varah, Alaia Manhattan Fencing Center E25 1737 1468.33
8 Radell, Zoe Capital Fencing Academy E26 1700 1420.84
9 Avatapalli, Sri Aadya Escrimeur Fencers Club U 1725 1397.97
10 Rubanova, Aleksandra Integrity Fencing Studio U 1756 1359.81
11 Ong, Katherine Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1637 1354.55
12 Zhang, Annalyn Aura Fencing Academy U 1677 1328.50
13 Joseph, Azalée Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1698 1323.79
14 Konde, Anika Cobra Fencing Club LLC U 1597 1293.35
15 Wu, Jing Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy U 1444 1124.49
16 Yang, Rachel Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy U 1608 1109.58
17 Arango, Ivanna Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1377 1084.30
18 Meyerstein, Vivian Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1428 997.18
19 Sarbu, Esme Integrity Fencing Studio U 1307 958.15
20 Prakash, Lithika Premier Fencing Club U 1233 818.50
21 DeMatteis, Katarina Lilov Fencing Academy U 1292 800.91
22 Naik, Annika Manhattan Fencing Center U 1277 736.75
23 Maddison, Estelle Z1 Fencing Club U 1146 629.36
24 Maddison, Emily Z1 Fencing Club U 1139 427.29
25 El-Nazer, Salwa International Fencing Club U 1470 183.27

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!