February NAC

Veteran 50-59 Men’s Saber (V50MS)

Saturday, February 14, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Register

Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3148 3318 - 2943
5 - 8 2586 2886 - 2367
9 - 16 2303 2539 - 2185
17 - 26 1868 2278 - 1219

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Makogon, Sergey Triple Threat Fencing Academy B25 3318 2909.20
2 Phillips, Kim Zeta Fencing A25 3232 2883.44
3 Bush, Joshua Lincoln Fencing Club B25 3097 2593.04
4 Penton, Robert Triple Threat Fencing Academy C24 2943 2572.63
5 Dolegiewicz, Mariusz Midwest Fencing Club B23 2663 2165.98
6 Krasowitz, Jason Fencing Academy Of Denver C25 2886 2080.88
7 Samotessov, Vladislav Infinity Fencing Alliance C25 2367 2036.85
8 colter, richard Denver Fencing Center C25 2430 2002.95
9 Zoller, Matthew Fencing Academy Of Denver B24 2279 1956.64
10 Boylan, John Louisville Fencing Center, Inc. D25 2330 1864.40
11 Plonka, Derek Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) D25 2243 1857.98
12 Katz, Jason Stamford Fencing Center, LLC D24 2539 1836.90
13 Lukibanov, Oleg Alle Fencing Club C23 2328 1776.25
14 Cho, Yutong Fencers Club Inc. C24 2254 1748.94
15 Monarch, Tom Louisville Fencing Center, Inc. D24 2266 1686.60
16 Meehan, Justin Orion Fencing C25 2185 1631.45
17 Szulim, Rad Capital Fencing Academy E25 2187 1630.29
18 Bartlett, Jonathan New York Athletic Club C25 2193 1572.09
19 Chen, Lester West Coast Fencing Academy B25 2106 1509.18
20 Staten, Joseph Salle Auriol Seattle E25 1790 1396.90
21 Wang, Albert Fencing Academy Of Denver U 1787 1307.38
22 Cogan, Derek Spartak E24 1710 1148.23
23 Abousamra, Mamdou C23 2278 1042.17
24 Pinto, Augusto Tim Morehouse Fencing Club E25 1595 926.91
25 dhar, asif Capital Fencing Academy U 1219 542.00
26 Springer, Michael LEO Fencing Club U 1813 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!