Raleigh Convention Center - Raleigh, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 2 | CALDERA Lexi I. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 3 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 3 | NIX Reagan | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
| 5 | DUNSEATH Lauren M. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 6 | PLAZA-GASALLA Gloria | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 7 | DONGES Anna | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 8 | UNGURIANU Nika | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 9 | CARRIER Meredith | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 10 | SANFORD Kenyatta L. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 28% |
| 11 | LI Fei | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 12 | HSIU Elizabeth | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 13 | HESS Heidi J. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
| 14 | LEE yat ching | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 46% | 27% |
| 15 | LI Alisha | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
| 16 | WONG HIN SANG Annabelle | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | SEREGIN Katya | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 18 | WALLER DEL VALLE Andrea | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 19 | WALLER DEL VALLE Alanis | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 20 | PULLEN Ayah | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 21 | CAMPBELL Eva | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | NIEMAN Anjolie | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | PARSONS Mischa | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 24 | RHEINECKER Claire | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | CHANG Chloe | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 26 | LIANG Jingjing | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 27 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | MACEDON Gianna | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | ZHANG Helen | 35% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 30 | WALLER DEL VALLE Alexandra | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 31 | MURPHY Katherine | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | NOH Rachel | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 33 | WONG Caitlin | 1% | 8% | 32% | 41% | 16% | 2% | |
| 34 | WANG Zoe | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 35 | PAN Angela | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 36 | DONG Ava | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 37 | YOU Joyce | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | BANKS Lauren M. | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | |
| 39 | NELSON Grace E. | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 40 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 41 | COLELLA Lauren | 4% | 22% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | GAUR Ishi | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 43 | CHEN Alicia | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | BARCLAY Khyri | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 45 | BASRALIAN Azniv | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 46% | 17% | |
| 46 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 47 | THOMAS Meagan R. | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | SCHLEE Selma | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | SAZONOVA Alexandra | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | RHEINECKER Eleanora Grace | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | BARDIN Kira | 1% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | CHUANG Ramona | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 53 | MIHILL Margaret | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 54 | HILBY Olivia | 16% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | LOFTIS Hunter | 40% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | YAO KATHARINE | < 1% | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 57 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 58 | RALSTON Katherine | 23% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 59 | MAY Courtney | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | JULIEN Erica | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 61 | GROCE Linda J. | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.