Raleigh Convention Center - Raleigh, NC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | EYER Hailey M. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
2 | FEDELI Caterina S. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
3 | HU Felice | V D D V D D | V V V V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
3 | YANG Iris | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
5 | CHEN Allison V. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
6 | CHEN Chloe I. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
7 | KIM Rachel | V D V V V D | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
8 | CHO Emily (Euran) | V V D V V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
9 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
10 | ORVANANOS Anice | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
11 | SHENG Chuxi | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
12 | YANG Emma | V V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
13 | LIN Zhi tong | D V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
14 | SEO IRENE Y. | V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
15 | CHOW Annabelle | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
16 | PEVZNER Nicole | V D V V D D | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
17 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | V V V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
18 | MI Aileen | D V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
19 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | V V D V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
20 | MEI Sarah | D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
21 | LUO Sandra J. | V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
21 | CALISE Ella | V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
23 | LEE Lavender | V V V D V D | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
24 | WANDJI Anais | V V D V V D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
25 | LAI Sophia | V D V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
26 | SHMAY Anastasia | D V V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
27 | LI Eleanor | D V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
28 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | V V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
29 | LIU Angel(Daying) | D D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
29 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | V D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
31 | BERGEL Daphne | D D V D V V | V V D | 0.8 | 3 | +2.2 |
32 | LI Sophia M. | D D D D D V | V V D | 4.5 | 1 | -3.5 |
33 | MANIKTALA Prisha | V V V V V V | D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
34 | CHEN Renee | V V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
35 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | D V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
36 | HSU Kaylin | V V V V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
37 | MCSHERRY Ava | D V V D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
38 | LEVY Avery | V V V D D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
39 | ZHOU Catherine | V V V D V D | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
40 | COOPER Piper W. | V D D V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
41 | XIE Lillian | V V D V D V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
42 | YURKOVA Mariia | V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
43 | FENG Grace | D V V V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
44 | WANG Jasmine | D V V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
45 | SHIM Grace J. | V D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
46 | WEI Angela | V D D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
47 | KIM Sydney | V D V D V D | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
48 | REN Kayley | V D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
49 | SAIFEE Lamya | V V V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
50 | PAULUS Sloane E. | V V D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
51 | CASCONE Emily | V D V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
52 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | D V D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
53 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | D D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
54 | LI Han (Helina) | D V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
55 | BURBERRY Livia | D D D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
56 | WANG Joanna | D V D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
57 | WANG Chloe | D V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
58 | ZHANG Ivy | D D V V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
59 | BAE Yooju | V D D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
60 | ZELDIN Nadia | D V D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
61 | WANG CAROL | D D V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
62 | SHA Yi Ling | D D D V V D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
63 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | V D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
64 | CAO Kayla | D D D V D D | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
65 | YU Jane | V D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
66 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | V D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
67 | LAO Sophia | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
68 | HARRIS Julia | V D D D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
69 | TANG Melody Fujiao | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
69 | ZOU Ella | D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
71 | HAN Katherine | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
72 | HWANG Chanel | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
73 | GUEVARRA Isabelle C. | D V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
73 | WANG Sophia | D D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
75 | MATHAI Rachel | D D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
76 | VERGARA Jaden Reese | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
77 | LI Xiang (Shining) | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
78 | REZA Fukaina | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
79 | OWENS Elise | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
80 | TAMIR Esu | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
81 | DONG Emily | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
82 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
83 | MULLER Van | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
84 | WANG DINA C. | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
85 | UHRICH Reese | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
86 | KRINGS Sasha | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
87 | SUNMAN Rory | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.