Raleigh Convention Center - Raleigh, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CRAIG Samuel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 2 | CORTEZ Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
| 3 | MORALES Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
| 3 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
| 5 | YE Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 6 | HUANG Connor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 7 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 8 | KIM ELIJAH | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 9 | BONSELL Vance | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 10 | GUFFEY Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% |
| 11 | HONG Steven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 12 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
| 13 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 3% | |
| 14 | YAO JINCHENG | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 15 | RODRIGUEZ Darlin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% |
| 16 | COLE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 17 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 18 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
| 19 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 20 | SHANKWILER Christopher | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
| 21 | ZHU Charlie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 22 | HUANG Tom | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 23 | LI Yiwei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 24 | YAO JINTAO | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 39% | 10% |
| 25 | WU Richard | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | KALPATHY Rohit | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
| 27 | VELTZ Tyler J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 28 | CHON Collin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | ZHANG Ethan W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 30 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
| 30 | ROE Finnegan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 5% | |
| 32 | KATZ Ryan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 33 | WANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% |
| 34 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
| 35 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
| 37 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 38 | BOSITA Carson | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 39 | GAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 40 | LOPEZ Lucas M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
| 41 | MAY Griffin M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 42 | YAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | BERA Enzo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 43 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% |
| 45 | GLOZMAN Justin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
| 46 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
| 47 | FIRSTMAN William B. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 48 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 48 | DUDNICK Christian | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 50 | FENKER William M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
| 51 | FORMENTI Giulio | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 3% | |
| 52 | LUCAS Hayden | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 53 | HOTHA Nikhil | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 54 | TASIKAS Stylianos | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 55 | LIN Steve | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 56 | ETIN Ari | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 57 | FERGUSON Constantine | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 58 | YAN William | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 2% | |
| 59 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 60 | ZHOU William | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 61 | GUREVICH Savely | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | MAUREL Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
| 63 | FANG Eason | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | HUNG Samuel | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 65 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 66 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 67 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 2% |
| 68 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 16% |
| 69 | SCHNEIDER Allen J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 40% |
| 70 | CHEN Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 71 | JAIN Aniket | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 72 | CHOKSI Vihaan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 73 | ALFAU LARACUENTE Gabriel | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
| 74 | MAHAPATRA SAMARTH | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 75 | HOPPA Luke H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
| 76 | STAMIS Kyle | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% |
| 77 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 78 | SMINK Oliver | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 79 | KANG evan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 9% |
| 80 | ZHOU James Y. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 80 | LIGH Checed | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 83 | LIN Felix | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 84 | DECK Tyson | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 85 | FREDRICK Jameer | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 86 | TIAGI Daniel | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 87 | ZHANG Yupeng | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 88 | KAUFMAN III Robert (Trey) G. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 89 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 89 | JENSBY Jason | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 91 | BOUKHTIN Maxim | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 92 | GAUVEY Kieran | 100% | 98% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 93 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 94 | CHABENAT Guillaume | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 95 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% |
| 96 | HAN Edward | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 97 | DE SOUZA CABRERO Yorrick | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 98 | SHANKAR Karthik | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 98 | WANG Weiyun | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 100 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 101 | HO Jacob | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 102 | XU Justin | 100% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 103 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 104 | RABINOWITZ Mike | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 105 | CHO Yutong | 100% | 89% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 106 | DILLE Jackson K. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 107 | MARGULIS Jared | 100% | 76% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 108 | BREUER Daniel | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 109 | HUTTON Sawyer | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 110 | DEKA Tanush | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 111 | DHAR asif | 100% | 95% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 112 | KUSANAGI Soshi | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 113 | XU Ivan | 100% | 76% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 114 | PAK Matthew | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 115 | BLOODWORTH Drake | 100% | 97% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 116 | MANESCU Miron | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 117 | MILLS Matthew P. | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 118 | REHM Liam | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 119 | WHITE Joshua H. | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 120 | SCHIMEL Luke | 100% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 121 | CUNLIFFE Sebastian | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 122 | SEETHAMRAJU Pranay | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.