Denison University - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | KENNEDY Elizabeth | - | - | 7% | 48% | 45% | |
2 | LEMASTERS Elise | 2% | 21% | 53% | 22% | 2% | - |
3 | KOZINSKI Allison | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 40% | 8% |
3 | KING Emily | - | - | - | 11% | 50% | 39% |
5 | PARA Akshaya | 8% | 41% | 46% | 4% | - | |
6 | GUSKA Jenn | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
7 | BROWNING Ruby | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
8 | GRAVES Emilia | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
9 | ROSABAL Isabella | - | 7% | 46% | 43% | 4% | |
10 | SIDARAS Christina | 2% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% | |
11 | SCHNURR Sophia | 2% | 35% | 47% | 15% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.