Rain City Super Youth Circuit (SYC)

Youth 12 Men’s Foil (Y12MF)

Sunday, April 19, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Register

Rain City Fencing Center - Bellevue, WA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2096 2280 - 1900
5 - 8 1974 2112 - 1893
9 - 16 1805 1899 - 1692
17 - 32 1632 1885 - 1463
33 - 64 1316 1766 - 889
65 - 66 972 1217 - 726

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Park, Andrew Silicon Valley Fencing Center C25 2280 2027.08
2 Lyu, Brandon Golubitsky Fencing Center C25 2233 1969.92
3 Rau, Shogun Silicon Valley Fencing Center D25 1971 1719.67
4 Peskin, Kepler Northwest Fencing Center U 1900 1644.14
5 Lo, Enzo S-Class Fencing U 2112 1643.19
6 Zhang, Aiden U 1959 1637.17
7 Park, Avan Silicon Valley Fencing Center E25 1893 1635.21
8 Jin, Yucheng LA International Fencing U 1930 1624.68
9 Xu, Ethan Silicon Valley Fencing Center E25 1831 1574.23
10 Ding, Sam Bay Area Fencing Club U 1827 1545.59
11 Zhang, William Team Touche Fencing Center U 1802 1537.89
12 Slain, Owen Saratoga Fencing Club E25 1781 1530.23
13 Chen, Steven E25 1899 1514.17
14 Tsui, Kaylan Ho Sen SoCAL Fencing Center U 1761 1504.38
15 Savage, Angus Northwest Fencing Center U 1850 1481.48
16 Sun, Lucas Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1692 1433.64
17 Alvarez, Francisco Janusz Maximum Fencing Club U 1672 1420.46
18 Yu, Jinyuan Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1693 1419.71
19 Raj, Yojith Maximum Fencing Club U 1712 1413.35
20 Ligeret, Leo Rain City Fencing Center U 1680 1387.91
21 Foo, Kingston SoCAL Fencing Center U 1644 1374.14
22 tan, benjamin SoCAL Fencing Center U 1599 1333.81
23 Li, Evan S-Class Fencing U 1839 1316.87
24 Liu, Aiden Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1604 1310.77
25 Sun, Oliver Rain City Fencing Center U 1626 1284.47
26 Chen, Dante U 1665 1271.78
27 Nguyen, Norris Maximum Fencing Club U 1540 1265.72
28 Li, Lief Maximum Fencing Club U 1463 1198.71
29 Li, Alistair S-Class Fencing U 1885 1179.86
30 Meng, Eric Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1466 1177.78
31 Su, Aiden U 1537 1176.27
32 Sha, Laien SoCAL Fencing Center U 1479 1170.43
33 Jue, Lucas Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1441 1157.49
34 Kajita, Grayson Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1409 1144.29
35 Li, Mason Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1402 1142.92
36 Wang, Mingcheng U 1766 1125.84
37 Lam, Lazarus U 1462 1109.10
38 Ho, Kasper Prime Fencing Academy U 1453 1102.56
39 Rosowsky, Phoenix Space City Fencing Academy U 1411 1099.53
40 Yan, Aaron Silicon Valley Fencing Center E25 1376 1088.64
41 Meng, Andy Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1357 1087.09
42 Ryu, Griffin Rain City Fencing Center U 1363 1022.13
43 Bagwell, Theodore SoCAL Fencing Center U 1338 1012.98
44 Zhang, Bryant Maximum Fencing Club U 1314 955.61
45 Lin, Stewart Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1279 944.58
46 Huang, Aaron Jingyuan Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1606 921.30
47 Lin, Dylan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1208 913.89
48 McBride, Sam Northwest Fencing Center U 1336 897.56
49 Li, Jonathan S-Class Fencing U 1153 813.74
50 Jiang, Justin Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1486 798.80
51 Ma, Madrid U 1208 785.09
52 Xu, Benjamin Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1050 704.72
53 Oh, Timothy Rain City Fencing Center U 1200 692.99
54 Zhang, Dennis S-Class Fencing U 1398 692.94
55 Su, Jet S-Class Fencing U 1134 522.07
56 Brod, Baylin Space City Fencing Academy U 906 442.41
57 Su, Jayden Epic Fencing Club U 1289 269.75
58 LANG, Xixi U 1748 190.88
59 Zhang, Xitai (Louis) U 1075 46.64
60 Zhang, Yuen Epic Fencing Club U 889 < 0
61 Yu, Henrich Edmonton Fencing Club U 1628 < 0
62 Li, Brian S-Class Fencing U 937 < 0
63 Zhang, Luke Epic Fencing Club U 1170 < 0
64 Hummer, Jaxson Rain City Fencing Center U 1317 < 0
65 Li, William Metro Tacoma Fencing Club U 726 < 0
66 Li, Will U 1217 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!