Long Island Challenge ROC & RPC

Division IA Men’s Saber (D1AMS)

Saturday, February 28, 2026 at 12:15 PM

Register

Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2398 2465 - 2311
5 - 8 2310 2321 - 2294
9 - 16 2108 2364 - 1934
17 - 24 1547 2029 - 974

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Suba, Lucas Peter Westbrook Foundation B25 2465 2215.72
2 Chen, Jonathan Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy A25 2428 2175.28
3 Porter, Dupree Stamford Fencing Center, LLC B25 2386 2134.29
4 Karavas, Nicholas Fencing Academy Of Boston C25 2311 2060.00
5 Wong, Max Manhattan Fencing Center B25 2320 2057.54
6 Dai, Zihou Z1 Fencing Club D25 2305 2055.08
7 Medvinsky, Daniel Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 2321 2053.26
8 Tozzi, Massimo Rochester Institute of Technology Fencing Club C24 2294 1995.45
9 Yu, Zhexuan The Storm King School C24 2364 1974.08
10 Notopradono, Nicholas Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy D25 2185 1933.33
11 Sadhu, Neiyam Aura Fencing Academy C25 2171 1920.42
12 Wang, Theodore Z1 Fencing Club C26 2100 1826.88
13 Liang, Morgan Long Island Fencing Center E25 2088 1819.10
14 Lamtan, Christoffer Manhattan Fencing Center C25 2020 1767.54
15 Desautels, Connor Wayne State University NCAA C24 2000 1713.09
16 Gordon, Samuel International Fencing Club E25 1934 1634.21
17 Bhaskar, Dhananjay Scarsdale Fencing Center E25 2029 1549.48
18 Shapiro, Simon Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1820 1523.14
19 Losquadro, Joseph Mission Fencing Center E25 1778 1481.57
20 Sayar, Luke American Institute Of Fencing D25 1737 1477.36
21 Zhang, Simon Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy E25 1580 1269.95
22 Hausler, Jayden Hills Fencing Institute E25 1291 956.61
23 Martinez, Luke Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy U 1169 571.19
24 Jagannathan, Ajay Cobra Fencing Club LLC U 974 374.63

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!