Long Island Challenge ROC & RPC

Division II Men’s Saber (DV2MS)

Sunday, March 1, 2026 at 3:30 PM

Register

Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2276 2321 - 2185
5 - 8 2055 2100 - 2011
9 - 16 1658 2000 - 1291
17 - 22 1502 2500 - 974

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Dai, Zihou Z1 Fencing Club D25 2305 2055.08
2 Medvinsky, Daniel Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 2321 2053.26
3 Tozzi, Massimo Rochester Institute of Technology Fencing Club C24 2294 1995.45
4 Notopradono, Nicholas Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy D25 2185 1933.33
5 Wang, Theodore Z1 Fencing Club C26 2100 1826.88
6 Liang, Morgan Long Island Fencing Center E25 2088 1819.10
7 Lamtan, Christoffer Manhattan Fencing Center C25 2020 1767.54
8 Swift, Owen Shoreline Fencers Club D25 2011 1728.51
9 Desautels, Connor Wayne State University NCAA C24 2000 1713.09
10 Gordon, Samuel International Fencing Club E25 1934 1634.21
11 Losquadro, Joseph Mission Fencing Center E25 1778 1481.57
12 Sayar, Luke American Institute Of Fencing D25 1737 1477.36
13 Zhang, Simon Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy E25 1580 1269.95
14 Onugha II, Emeka Peter Westbrook Foundation E24 1607 981.16
15 Hausler, Jayden Hills Fencing Institute E25 1291 956.61
16 Song, Ryan Long Island Fencing Center U 1333 923.09
17 Martinez, Luke Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy U 1169 571.19
18 Chiang, Ethan Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1275 411.09
19 Jagannathan, Ajay Cobra Fencing Club LLC U 974 374.63
20 Yun, Matthew Long Island Fencing Center U 1132 213.23
21 Cooper, Samuel Sheridan Fencing Academy of Westchester U 1964 59.81
22 Beckerman, Sander New Jersey Fencing Alliance U 2500 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!