Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DE LA FOSCADE-CONDON Celine | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
| 2 | CARTER Jane P. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 86% |
| 3 | BASSIK Judith M. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 3 | CHOY Ida | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | - |
| 5 | KERR Margaret E. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 35% | 12% | |
| 6 | HERMES Kathleen A. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | - |
| 7 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 8 | GREENLEAF Amy Sue | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 9 | BALDWIN Aimi | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 10 | MCGRATH Polina S. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | - |
| 11 | WANG Grace | 27% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 12 | CAWTHORN Muriel C. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 13 | TASKER Monisha B. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.