Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | LU Elaine | - | - | 1% | 15% | 59% | 25% |
2 | SAYLES Nina R. | - | - | - | 5% | 45% | 50% |
3 | HILD Nisha | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
3 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | - | - | 4% | 37% | 59% |
5 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | - | 8% | 50% | 41% | |
6 | MALEK Zolie | 1% | 13% | 64% | 21% | 2% | |
7 | GHOSH Priyanka | - | - | - | 7% | 54% | 38% |
8 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | - | 9% | 49% | 42% | |
9 | CHAVAN Arya | - | 3% | 34% | 54% | 9% | - |
10 | YEN Natalie | - | 5% | 32% | 43% | 18% | 1% |
11 | NEUMAN Ella | - | 9% | 55% | 33% | 2% | - |
12 | BIRNSTILL Reese | 3% | 22% | 47% | 25% | 3% | - |
13 | ONG Lauren | 30% | 60% | 10% | - | - | |
14 | BIBLER Anna | 13% | 57% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
15 | CHIANG Melissa | 1% | 9% | 37% | 44% | 9% | - |
16 | SMITH Maya | 35% | 55% | 10% | - | - | - |
17 | KHERA Anya | 75% | 23% | 1% | - | - | - |
18 | DONG Angel | - | 3% | 23% | 45% | 27% | 2% |
19 | KIM Nam Heui | - | 3% | 26% | 45% | 24% | 2% |
20 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 28% | 48% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
21 | AKULA Roszlynn | 34% | 47% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
22 | HARRISON Allie | 53% | 43% | 4% | - | - | - |
23 | OPITZ Allyson | 60% | 37% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.