Division 1 & Para Championships / April NAC

Division I Men’s Foil (DV1MF)

Friday, April 24, 2026 at 12:00 AM

Register

Greater Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3814 4455 - 3532
5 - 8 3240 3488 - 3137
9 - 16 2928 3131 - 2700
17 - 21 2552 2700 - 2365

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Emmer, Chase Massialas Foundation (M Team) A25 4455 4177.04
2 Li, Richard US Air Force Academy NCAA University A25 3721 3455.19
3 Rusadze, Nickolas University Of Notre Dame NCAA A25 3550 3286.67
4 Stanley, Mason University Of Notre Dame NCAA A25 3532 3265.23
5 Huth, Mitchell The Ohio State University NCAA A25 3488 3227.64
6 Co, Dylan Massialas Foundation (M Team) A25 3195 2940.91
7 Rose, Ben Apex Fencing Academy A24 3137 2882.52
8 Traugot, Owen Manhattan Fencing Center A25 3142 2881.04
9 Tang, Owen Epic Fencing Club A24 3131 2876.76
10 Canlas, Nathan LA International Fencing A26 3125 2863.51
11 Nguyen, Martin LA International Fencing A25 2990 2736.45
12 Ling, Eddie Massialas Foundation (M Team) A25 2976 2718.52
13 Cortright, Skipper Bay Area Fencing Club A26 2938 2683.34
14 Wu, Alber Silicon Valley Fencing Center A26 2839 2588.53
15 Yi, William LA International Fencing A25 2725 2475.25
16 Derrick, Blake Silicon Valley Fencing Center A25 2700 2449.11
17 Choi, Ethan Golubitsky Fencing Center A25 2700 2445.44
18 Li, Aaron Moe Fencing Club LLC B25 2570 2317.95
19 Cheng, Logan Star Fencing Academy A25 2567 2312.27
20 Park, Sky LA International Fencing B25 2558 2305.99
21 Bieler, Mason LA International Fencing A25 2365 2115.59

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!