Division 1 & Para Championships / April NAC

Veteran 70 & Older Men’s Foil (V70MF)

Saturday, April 25, 2026 at 12:00 AM

Register

Greater Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2989 3079 - 2886
5 - 8 2666 2863 - 2482
9 - 16 2250 2463 - 1844
17 - 25 1296 1870 - 573

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lawrence, John Masters Fencing Academy NJ A22 3055 2740.35
2 Streb, Joseph Columbus International Fencing Academy B24 3079 2714.00
3 Darricau, Henri Denver Fencing Center B26 2935 2634.48
4 Bennett, Philippe Fencers Club Inc. B25 2886 2521.12
5 Gross, Stephen Rockville Fencing Academy B23 2863 2510.71
6 LeBlanc, Gerald Elite Fencing Club B25 2652 2320.26
7 Patterson, Jan Salle Auriol Seattle D25 2665 2309.97
8 Lutton, Thomas Denver Fencing Center B25 2482 2196.28
9 McCarthy, Daniel The Phoenix Center C22 2445 2042.00
10 Dorfman, Mitchell Morris Fencing Club C25 2374 2023.38
11 Mariani, Lou The Fencing Center C22 2238 1878.42
12 Milligan, Bruce Savage Fencing Club D25 2463 1771.24
13 Drake, David Team Touche Fencing Center C23 2180 1727.91
14 Pegues, William Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E22 2421 1528.69
15 Kazimiroff, Paul Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) U 2035 1487.98
16 Gladnick, Michael Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA C24 1844 1443.02
17 Precciozzi, Aldo Space City Fencing Academy E26 1670 1279.87
18 Piatkowski-Nazarro, Marek Elite Fencing Club D25 1870 1232.25
19 Williams, Theodore Cyranos Place U 1788 990.21
20 Mazza, Daniel Davis Fencing Academy U 1323 683.02
21 Hill, David Boston Fencing Club U 1146 611.75
22 Anderson, Donald New Mexico Fencing Foundation U 1114 493.17
23 Labow, Howard Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1207 < 0
24 Botwinick, Nelson Fencers Club Inc. U 973 < 0
25 OMalley, michael Marx Fencing Academy U 573 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!