The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Jason Liu and (2) Abdel Salem.

Take Action

Event Preview

Cadet Women’s Foil (CDTWF)

Collegiate Cup RJCCSaturday, May 9, 2026 at 1:30 PM

Back to tournament Register
Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego · La Jolla, CA
58 approved entrants 5 strength bands

Strength distribution

Finish Range Average Range
1 - 4 2503 2544 - 2421
5 - 8 2187 2332 - 2131
9 - 16 2083 2116 - 2021
17 - 32 1890 2023 - 1783
33 - 58 1522 1799 - 984

Registrations
1 Duan, Sophie Team Touche Fencing Center A26 2544 2290.13
2 Kim, Sydney Elite Fencing Club A26 2530 2275.49
3 Liu, Samantha SoCAL Fencing Center B26 2518 2264.47
4 Zhang, Ivy LA International Fencing B26 2421 2167.93
5 Chan, Mila Massialas Foundation (M Team) B26 2332 2067.65
6 Wu, Chingfei Amber Precision Athletics Fencing Club C26 2147 1896.82
7 Tao, Ann Silicon Valley Fencing Center B26 2137 1884.64
8 Kensicki, Phoebe LA International Fencing C26 2131 1878.61
9 Dai, Iris Yuyang Golubitsky Fencing Center B26 2116 1864.76
10 Park, Lauren Precision Athletics Fencing Club C26 2110 1855.97
11 Zhou, Joi SoCAL Fencing Center C26 2103 1853.49
12 Miyashiro, Katelyn Precision Athletics Fencing Club C26 2101 1847.40
13 Hsiao, Ariya Silicon Valley Fencing Center B26 2090 1841.42
14 Yao, Abby SoCAL Fencing Center C26 2085 1834.59
15 Lai, Miranda Fencing Institute Of Texas D26 2039 1783.75
16 Neumann, Erika Golden State Fencing Academy C25 2021 1769.53
17 Liu, Ashley SoCAL Fencing Center B25 2023 1769.45
18 Rui, Jessie SoCAL Fencing Center C26 1969 1715.28
19 Pedersen, Haley United Fencing Academy C26 1979 1713.14
20 Yong, Rosalind Team Touche Fencing Center B25 1978 1710.40
21 Chang, Lydia Silicon Valley Fencing Center C25 1947 1695.05
22 Zee, Savannah SoCAL Fencing Center C25 1944 1691.76
23 Lee, Zoe Silicon Valley Fencing Center D26 1911 1657.38
24 Chan, Ella Massialas Foundation (M Team) C25 1888 1632.08
25 Kim, Natalie Maximum Fencing Club C26 1863 1611.59
26 Desai, Zoya Precision Athletics Fencing Club D26 1840 1588.67
27 Yang, Hanli LA International Fencing C25 1856 1588.58
28 Jin, Jada Y Maximum Fencing Club C26 1847 1578.54
29 Fang, Kelervia Team Touche Fencing Center D26 1822 1569.67
30 Cho, Karis Massialas Foundation (M Team) C25 1812 1555.06
31 Han, Gian Team Touche Fencing Center D26 1783 1531.50
32 Yu, Sophie Silicon Valley Fencing Center D25 1784 1529.20
33 Zhang, Viviana Golubitsky Fencing Center C25 1796 1524.83
34 Lim, Kensie SoCAL Fencing Center D25 1762 1507.65
35 Deng, Claire Team Touche Fencing Center D25 1744 1491.55
36 Wang, Doreen LA International Fencing D26 1738 1487.29
37 Chung, Katie SoCAL Fencing Center C26 1721 1460.00
38 Li, Chelsea Prime Fencing Academy D26 1690 1420.32
39 Saifee, Zahra Precision Athletics Fencing Club D26 1668 1413.46
40 Saifee, Sakina Precision Athletics Fencing Club E26 1658 1405.55
41 Shusta, Lily Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club D25 1644 1378.63
42 Fan, Sophia Golubitsky Fencing Center D25 1621 1350.43
43 Kim, Lauren Team Touche Fencing Center E26 1581 1312.03
44 Chen, Yifan Golubitsky Fencing Center E26 1574 1310.77
45 Lucas, Ava Elite Fencing Club D26 1522 1241.04
46 gowda, Siyona SoCAL Fencing Center D25 1497 1224.89
47 Zhang, Queeny SoCAL Fencing Center E26 1440 1167.81
48 Fu, Joy SoCAL Fencing Center D26 1447 1147.68
49 Tewari, Amaira Maximum Fencing Club U 1420 1146.06
50 Chen, Madeleine SoCAL Fencing Center E25 1433 1138.80
51 Tai, Taphanie California Fencing Academy U 1315 1002.54
52 Tu, Averie SoCAL Fencing Center E25 1338 996.87
53 DeJoy, Leilah Team Touche Fencing Center U 1234 945.31
54 garnica, katya valentina Elite International Fencers Club U 1758 888.10
55 Dong, Nancy Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1109 821.20
56 Ling, Camryn SoCAL Fencing Center U 1068 699.58
57 Cardenas Montoya, Dilany Ximena Elite International Fencers Club U 1799 599.61
58 Oh, Amber Elite International Fencers Club U 984 417.18

Rank is based on the conservative estimate, `mu - 3*sigma`, rather than raw strength alone. Newer or less-certain fencers can still appear lower than someone with a similar average but tighter confidence.