Bull City Y8 RYC/RJCC Tournament

Youth 14 Men’s Saber (Y14MS)

Saturday, April 4, 2026 at 1:00 PM

Register

Pro 3:5 Sports Academy - Raleigh, NC

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1865 1943 - 1822
5 - 8 1819 1854 - 1779
9 - 16 1544 1789 - 1390
17 - 28 1449 2500 - 484

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Schwartzman, Jakub Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1943 1581.45
2 Gilbert, Ari Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1857 1564.61
3 Rinaldi, Benigno Nova Fencing Club U 1822 1558.72
4 Chou, Qianhao Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1839 1552.97
5 Liao, Sirui Miracle Fencing Club E25 1820 1529.30
6 Ghim, Ethan Charlotte Sabers Fencing Academy U 1823 1514.26
7 Wang, Ziyao Miracle Fencing Club D26 1779 1468.30
8 Arrant, Mason U 1854 1434.38
9 Polsani, Gaurav Nellya Fencers E25 1789 1380.84
10 Yeazel, Colin Forge Fencing Teams DUR E25 1605 1255.28
11 Pipke, Garrett Nova Fencing Club U 1562 1239.55
12 Rimmele, Sven Yan Alpha Fencing Academy U 1488 1113.83
13 Guo, Lining Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1483 1103.64
14 Moore, Blaise Forge Fencing Teams DUR E25 1527 1018.76
15 Barrionuevo, Nicolas Alle Fencing Club U 1390 1018.46
16 Goldstein, Malcolm Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1511 984.68
17 Bergan, Chase Nova Fencing Club U 1436 977.50
18 McCabe, Donovan Nova Fencing Club U 1474 959.14
19 Chen, Tim Capital Fencing Academy U 1564 622.44
20 Evelyn, Wyatt Miracle Fencing Club U 1320 622.01
21 Chandra, Ayan Research Triangle Fencing U 1590 602.85
22 Prosper, Nathaniel Nova Fencing Club U 1039 545.18
23 Lamm, Tyler Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 1479 253.47
24 Mikhailov, Andrei DC Fencers Club U 2500 < 0
25 Zhu, Jackie Capital Fencing Academy U 1633 < 0
26 Villar, St John Miracle Fencing Club U 1307 < 0
27 Wolff, Charles Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1563 < 0
28 Yeazel, Reid Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 484 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!