Bull City Y8 RYC/RJCC Tournament

Youth 14 Men’s Saber (Y14MS)

Saturday, April 4, 2026 at 1:00 PM

Register

Pro 3:5 Sports Academy - Raleigh, NC

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1867 1953 - 1815
5 - 8 1821 1872 - 1754
9 - 16 1598 1730 - 1503
17 - 29 1306 2500 - 436

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Schwartzman, Jakub Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1953 1623.29
2 Gilbert, Ari Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1861 1574.13
3 Chou, Qianhao Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1838 1554.92
4 Rinaldi, Benigno Nova Fencing Club U 1815 1552.85
5 Liao, Sirui Miracle Fencing Club E25 1836 1552.68
6 Ghim, Ethan Charlotte Sabers Fencing Academy U 1821 1530.26
7 Arrant, Mason E26 1872 1503.64
8 Wang, Ziyao Miracle Fencing Club D26 1754 1452.53
9 Yeazel, Colin Forge Fencing Teams DUR E25 1712 1388.21
10 Polsani, Gaurav Nellya Fencers E25 1730 1348.91
11 Pipke, Garrett Nova Fencing Club U 1559 1249.49
12 Moore, Blaise Forge Fencing Teams DUR E25 1642 1216.01
13 McCabe, Donovan Nova Fencing Club U 1623 1171.82
14 Rimmele, Sven Yan Alpha Fencing Academy U 1511 1149.80
15 Guo, Lining Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1503 1140.54
16 Goldstein, Malcolm Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1503 1031.76
17 Barrionuevo, Nicolas Alle Fencing Club U 1393 1028.47
18 Xiong, Robert Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 1471 937.53
19 Bergan, Chase Nova Fencing Club U 1381 936.71
20 Chandra, Ayan Research Triangle Fencing U 1510 684.66
21 Chen, Tim Capital Fencing Academy U 1373 650.43
22 Evelyn, Wyatt Miracle Fencing Club U 1320 622.01
23 Prosper, Nathaniel Nova Fencing Club U 1016 532.59
24 Lamm, Tyler Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 1329 206.70
25 Mikhailov, Andrei DC Fencers Club U 2500 < 0
26 Villar, St John Miracle Fencing Club U 1123 < 0
27 Zhu, Jackie Capital Fencing Academy U 1097 < 0
28 Wolff, Charles Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1034 < 0
29 Yeazel, Reid Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 436 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!