Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PHILPOT Eden E. | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% | |
2 | OISHI Megumi | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
3 | ARNECKE Lauren A. | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
3 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
5 | KER Grace | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% | |
6 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 73% | |
7 | LEE Sophia | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 43% | 7% | |
8 | HOLMES Emma | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
9 | DRAGON Rainer | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
10 | HONE Katarina G. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | |
11 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% | |
12 | SHI Cathleen | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
13 | MARTURANO Bridget H. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
14 | SCOTT Eve | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
15 | HILD Nisha | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
16 | GRULICH Rayaana | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
17 | HUAI Delilah | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 31% | 8% | |
18 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
19 | SINHA Anika | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
20 | SADIK HANA | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
21 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
22 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | 2% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
23 | BILILIES Sophia | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 3% |
24 | NI Sharon | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 31% | 3% | |
25 | TUNG Renee | 2% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 8% | - | |
26 | LIU Yifei | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
27 | FAVO Isabella | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | |
28 | GOLDIN Nina | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
29 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
30 | BAE EMMELINE | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
31 | GHOSH Priyanka | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
32 | SCHMIDT Isabel | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
33 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
34 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
35 | COLTER Aurora | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
36 | NGUYEN Siena | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
37 | MANKOVA Varvara | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
38 | HENRY Soraya S. | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
39 | GRAFF Sophie | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
40 | TODD Phoebe | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
41 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 13% |
42 | NAYAK Esha | 6% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
43 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
44 | LIAO Siwen | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
45 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
46 | ZHANG Sophie | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
47 | JEONG Katie | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
48 | ENDO Miyuki N. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
49 | YAO Rainie | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
50 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
50 | SPEARS Mya B | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
52 | LIN Nicole | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
53 | XU Emily T. | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
53 | DENG Brooke | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
55 | WANG Zidan | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
56 | BAWA Anahat | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
57 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
58 | YUAN Greta | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 9% | |
59 | YANG Lea | 3% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
60 | LIM Jaslene | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
61 | MANN Sophia J. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
62 | HU Michelle | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
63 | PABIAN Emilia | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
64 | TONG Jessie | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
65 | SADANI Jyotika | 35% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
66 | LIU Sydney | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
67 | TAN Adelyn | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
68 | CHAN Kayla | 20% | 45% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
69 | DHAR Layla | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
70 | HUANG MADELINE | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
71 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
72 | CHIN Elise | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
73 | ISBERG Natalie | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
74 | NGUYEN Madeleine | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
75 | SCHICK Veronica | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
76 | LIGH Erenei J. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
77 | KYNETT Kathryn G. | - | < 1% | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
78 | CAO Sophie | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
79 | DUCKETT Leighton | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
80 | TREACY Aisling | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
81 | STONE Coral | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
82 | LUKER Hannah | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
83 | REGANTI Sitara | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
84 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.