Bull City Y8 RYC/RJCC Tournament

Cadet Men’s Saber (CDTMS)

Sunday, April 5, 2026 at 11:00 AM

Register

Pro 3:5 Sports Academy - Raleigh, NC

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2141 2294 - 1985
5 - 8 1823 1854 - 1779
9 - 16 1605 1789 - 1444
17 - 26 1538 2500 - 1174

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Henry, Cadel Forge Fencing Teams DUR C25 2294 2031.17
2 Rinaldi, Savio Nova Fencing Club C25 2253 2001.53
3 CAO, HAOTIAN Alpha Fencing Academy E25 2031 1768.47
4 Yang, Justin Alpha Fencing Academy D25 1985 1711.00
5 Chou, Qianhao Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1839 1552.97
6 Liao, Sirui Miracle Fencing Club E25 1820 1529.30
7 Wang, Ziyao Miracle Fencing Club D26 1779 1468.30
8 Arrant, Mason U 1854 1434.38
9 Kane, Kiran Nova Fencing Club E25 1769 1381.11
10 Polsani, Gaurav Nellya Fencers E25 1789 1380.84
11 Kohler, Vaughn Nellya Fencers E25 1632 1320.99
12 Yeazel, Colin Forge Fencing Teams DUR E25 1605 1255.28
13 Pipke, Garrett Nova Fencing Club U 1562 1239.55
14 Howerton, Beckett Miracle Fencing Club U 1515 1089.53
15 Huang, Anthony Bergen Fencing Club U 1444 1055.50
16 Moore, Blaise Forge Fencing Teams DUR E25 1527 1018.76
17 Bergan, Chase Nova Fencing Club U 1436 977.50
18 Xiong, Robert Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 1375 776.02
19 DeGuzman, Holden Bergen Fencing Club U 1370 729.65
20 Chen, Tim Capital Fencing Academy U 1564 622.44
21 Evelyn, Wyatt Miracle Fencing Club U 1320 622.01
22 Chandra, Ayan Research Triangle Fencing U 1590 602.85
23 Tuna, Abdullatif Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1174 230.98
24 Craft, Bakari Research Triangle Fencing U 2500 < 0
25 Xu, Miller Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1739 < 0
26 Villar, St John Miracle Fencing Club U 1307 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!