Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Joanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% |
| 2 | KRAHE Annika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 3 | CULLIVAN Sienna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 3 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% |
| 5 | DUAN Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
| 6 | BING Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% |
| 6 | YAO Abby | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 8 | YU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 9 | WANG Amabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 10 | EYER Brooke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 33% |
| 11 | WANG DINA C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 12 | LI Alice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 13 | CHAN Mila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
| 14 | LI Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
| 15 | KENSICKI Phoebe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
| 16 | ZHAO Olivia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 17 | LIGERET Stella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 18 | TSIMIKLIS aphrodite | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% |
| 19 | ZEE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 20 | MA Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 21 | LEE Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 34% | 3% |
| 22 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | 5% |
| 23 | SALMI-BYDALEK Ada | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 24 | LIM Kensie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 25 | ZHOU Joi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | PARK Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 27 | JI Dora | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% | 2% |
| 28 | CHANG Lydia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
| 29 | YIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 10% | |
| 30 | MCSHERRY Kayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 31 | SOE Hayleigh | 100% | 100% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | LI Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 21% | |
| 33 | CASHMAN Hailey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 34 | BO Iris | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 35 | ZHANG Viviana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 7% |
| 36 | BOIKE Lucille | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 16% |
| 37 | KNAPP Isabella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 38 | FRASER Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 5% |
| 39 | DE CASTRO Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | 6% |
| 40 | NAYGAS Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | HAFEZ Sahar | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
| 42 | WANG Doreen | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 42 | LU Keeva | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 44 | ZHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | TELEB Farida | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | SINGH Evangelina | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 47 | LIN Zhishan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | QIN Selina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
| 49 | CHOI Lydia | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 50 | KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 51 | DENG Claire | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 8% |
| 52 | LIM Kora | 100% | 98% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 53 | SMIRNOV Victoria | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 54 | KENNEDY Izadora | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 55 | THOTA Akira | 100% | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 56 | BENNETT Emi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 20% | 2% |
| 57 | AHN Hayley | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 58 | MORENO Josefina | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 59 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 60 | LLOYD Bianca | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 61 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 62 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 63 | LEO Jenna | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 64 | DAM Sofi | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 65 | ZHILKOV Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 66 | DZIWULSKI Elisabeth Claire | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 67 | XU Ella | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 68 | WU Allison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 8% |
| 69 | LEE Abigail | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 70 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 71 | ZHU Ella | 100% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 72 | LI Emma Jing | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 73 | HOM Emma | 100% | 96% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 74 | CHIN Riley | 100% | 71% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 75 | GE Deanna | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 76 | WASHINGTON KAILYNN ROSE | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 76 | LIU Ashley | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 78 | DUVVA Sanika | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 79 | TEWARI Amaira | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 80 | HSU Rachel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 81 | YANG Olivia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 82 | NEUMANN Erika | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 83 | YU Sien | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | ZHANG Hannah | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | XU Kaylee | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 86 | YU-TAN Claire | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 87 | CORDOVA Joscelyn | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | IANNI Isabel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 3% |
| 89 | DESAI Zoya | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 89 | REDEMANN Reagan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 91 | ZHAN Catherine | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 92 | SMITH Samantha | 100% | 68% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | HOLMES Remaliah | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 93 | KIM Rylie | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 95 | GOMEZ Amelia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 96 | SAIFEE Sakina | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 97 | RIVERA Leahy | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 98 | TAI Penelope | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 99 | XIA Isabella | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 100 | MAENG Gloria | 100% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 100 | WU Charlotte | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 102 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 98% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 103 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 104 | DILLON Zoe | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 104 | BENTLEY Amelia | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 106 | ZHUANG Katherine | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 107 | LI Annabelle | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 108 | YANG Byanca | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | LIU Mia | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 110 | MADAMINOVA Ariadna | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 111 | LIN Athena | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 112 | UPADRASHTA Anvi | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 113 | BAO Amelia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 114 | CHIANG Aria | 100% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 115 | ETIKALA Saanvi | 100% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 115 | FAN Lauren | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 115 | WU Karina | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 118 | ZHOU Jolena | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 119 | SMAJEK Lilou | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 119 | CHAN Jaclyn | 100% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 119 | ZEE Bella | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 122 | CERILO Bella | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 123 | TAI Destinee | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.