The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CLAES Thomas | - | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% |
2 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
3 | JAO Aaron | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
3 | HSU Joshua | - | - | 3% | 21% | 44% | 28% | 4% |
5 | BUCA Nora | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 45% | 18% |
6 | XU Chenyu | - | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
7 | MARTIN Zachary | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 4% |
8 | ARMSTRONG Hendry | 2% | 15% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
9 | PADHI Nisha | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
10 | CLARKSON Moby | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
11 | LIN Daniel | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
12 | ZHANG William | 35% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
13 | VINNAKOTA Lakshmi Laalasa | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
14 | LI Nathan | 27% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.