Brooklyn, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | - | 2% | 19% | 48% | 31% |
2 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 16% |
3 | CHIN Isabella | - | - | - | 2% | 36% | 62% |
4 | MAKSYMENKO Anna | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% |
5 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
6 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | - | - | 5% | 36% | 47% | 13% |
7 | SHEMIAKINA Sofia | 1% | 8% | 34% | 50% | 7% | - |
8 | KHARCHYNA Polina | - | - | - | 8% | 62% | 30% |
9 | ZHANG Yixuan | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
10 | TYLER Syd | - | - | 1% | 13% | 49% | 36% |
11 | TANG Elaine | 9% | 45% | 40% | 6% | - | - |
12 | STEPANOVA Yelyzaveta | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
13 | HAYNES Antonia | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
14 | BECKMAN Ana | - | 7% | 32% | 42% | 17% | 2% |
15 | CHUANG Ramona | 8% | 39% | 42% | 10% | - | - |
16 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | 15% | 47% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
17 | NYKYTIUK Mariia | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% |
18 | KUDIEROVA Anastasiia | 1% | 11% | 38% | 41% | 9% | 1% |
19 | WATTANAKIT Anda | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
20 | CHANG Abigail | 23% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
21 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | - | - | 5% | 33% | 45% | 17% |
22 | ZHANG Helen | 53% | 39% | 8% | - | - | - |
23 | SMOTRITSKY Liat | 13% | 41% | 37% | 8% | - | - |
24 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 5% |
25 | NGUYEN Ella | 10% | 44% | 39% | 7% | - | - |
25 | VICKERMAN Aspen | 9% | 37% | 40% | 13% | 1% | - |
27 | BARDIN Kira | 58% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - |
28 | VARAN Kateryna | 38% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
28 | HARASANI Thea | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
30 | KAPSALIS Maria | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.