Hopkins, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEZ Nolan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 27% |
| 2 | TAN Xinlai | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | |
| 3 | SANDERS Jack | 1% | 17% | 47% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 3 | MCKINLEY Luke | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 5 | MARTIN William | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
| 6 | WAKEHAM Timothy | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 7 | WAKEHAM Paul | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
| 8 | HOWLAND Jonas | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 9 | GLOVER George | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
| 10 | VELAZQUEZ Rosa | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 11 | BERSCHEID Arthur | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 12 | GIEBLER Lucas | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 13 | SHELTON Olivia | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 14 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 15 | KANG Marian | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 16 | MADSEN Lindsey | 10% | 35% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | HUANG Kai | 3% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 18 | CUNEO Luca | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 4% |
| 19 | SHAO Zhenghao | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 20 | IBARRA Alejandro | 9% | 40% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | BULLARD Sydney | 16% | 43% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | SMITH Henry | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 23 | HILL Elliott | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 24 | BOMGARDNER Ben | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | LAHR Nathan | 1% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 26 | LAHR Jonathan | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.