New Jersey Convention and Exposition Center - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 36% | 58% |
2 | WATTANAKIT Anda | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 40% | 15% | |
3 | HAFEEZ Hiba | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 41% | 5% |
3 | SHU Youshan | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% | |
5 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 62% |
6 | WANG Trinity | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
7 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | - | 6% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
8 | FAN Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 41% | 8% |
9 | TRAN Helena | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
10 | FENG Ge | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
11 | FANG Jocelyn | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
12 | BASRALIAN Azniv | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
13 | LEE Claire | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
14 | CHATIKHINE Anastasia | 1% | 10% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 2% | |
15 | HILLYER Megan | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
16 | ZHANG ANGELA | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | - |
17 | LI Fei | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% | |
18 | RITTER Brooklyn | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
19 | REKEDA Anna | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
20 | KAUR Manroop | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
21 | LIN Cynthia | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
22 | ZHENG Linden | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 25% | 3% |
23 | ZOU ZIXI | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
24 | ELKHATEEB Fajr | 3% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
25 | COLELLA Lauren | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
26 | LIN Victoria T. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | |
27 | PAN Angela | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
28 | SHANKERDAS Shreeya | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
29 | SHAKIR Inaaya | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
30 | CHANG Chloe | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
31 | HAUSHEER Kuncen | 10% | 44% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
32 | WANG Selina | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
33 | CHEN Alicia | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
34 | KRAJA Emma | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
35 | HE Lizbeth | 4% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | |
36 | FAKTOR Emily | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
37 | PHELAN Gabrielle | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
38 | MILLER Cassandra | 14% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
39 | SATO Elyse | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.