Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG Soleil C. | - | - | - | - | - | 8% | 91% |
2 | BAE Yooju | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
3 | BROWN Lola | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% |
3 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 30% |
5 | TAO Ann | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
6 | HAN Gian | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
7 | YAO Abby | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
8 | SOE Hayleigh | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | - |
9 | LUO Miranda | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 29% | 5% |
10 | HAN Mia | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
11 | LI Joy | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
12 | YU Sophie | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
13 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 44% | |
14 | CHANG Lydia | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% | - |
15 | WANG Doreen | 1% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
16 | PARK Lauren | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
17 | ZHOU Joi | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
18 | LI Alice | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 46% | 3% |
19 | WU Elynna | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 8% |
20 | AL-BATTAINEH Eva | - | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
21 | ZHANG Gwenyth | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 46% | 17% | |
22 | CHO Karis | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
23 | CHAN Mila | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 8% |
24 | SAH Madeleine | 1% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
25 | LEE Zoe | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
26 | HOM Avery | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
26 | LU Keeva | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | - |
28 | HSU Rachel | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
29 | ZEE Savannah | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
30 | NEUMANN Erika | 1% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
31 | WU Allison | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
32 | LIU Mia | 56% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
33 | SUN Chloe | - | - | - | - | - | 8% | 92% |
34 | CHAN Ella | 1% | 9% | 37% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - |
35 | KENSICKI Phoebe | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
36 | LING Camryn | 7% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
37 | DESAI Zoya | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
38 | ZHANG Elizabeth | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
39 | HOROWITZ Shuli | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | - |
40 | TEWARI Amaira | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
41 | TELEB Farida | 2% | 34% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | |
42 | WONNEBERG Kate | - | 9% | 34% | 40% | 15% | 2% | |
43 | LIU Ashley | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
44 | HOM Emma | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
45 | MORENO Josefina | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
46 | KIM Natalie | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
47 | CHEN Aimee | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
48 | NICOLETTI Thea | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
49 | REES Ava | 6% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
50 | LEE Abigail | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
51 | LI Emma Jing | 23% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
52 | YOUN Kylie | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
53 | JONES Rowan | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
54 | JIANG Ziqing | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
55 | LI Audrey | 44% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
56 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
57 | FATTAL Leila | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
58 | SCHULTZ Sumi | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
59 | KELLY Daphne | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
60 | QIN Adriana | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
61 | LIU Doris-Zihan Zhou | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
62 | SMIRNOV Victoria | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.