Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LUO Ashley | - | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% |
2 | AI Amy | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 13% |
3 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
3 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
5 | ZOU ZIXI | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% |
6 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% | |
7 | QI Jarynne Valerie | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
8 | SMUK Alexandra S. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% | |
9 | SUN Zeyu | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 19% | 3% | |
10 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
11 | PAN Angela | 1% | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
12 | AZMEH nour | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 40% | 8% |
13 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
14 | ZHAN Nancy | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 6% | |
15 | PRIHODKO Nina | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 23% | |
16 | HAFEEZ Hiba | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
17 | TRAN Helena | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
18 | BASRALIAN Azniv | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
19 | WONG HIN SANG Annabelle | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
20 | LI Olivia | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
21 | XIE Fiona | 4% | 30% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
22 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 3% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
23 | LI Fei | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% | |
24 | MONOVA Lilyana | 1% | 18% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
25 | MISHIMA Audrey | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
26 | WANG Sophie Y. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
27 | SHU Youshan | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 11% | |
28 | TRAN Katherine | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
29 | LI Suri | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | - |
30 | BI Michelle | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
31 | KANE Chloe | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
32 | KAUR Manroop | 12% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
33 | JUDICKE Olivia | 1% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - |
34 | DOUGLAS Marketa F. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
35 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 5% | 40% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | |
36 | CHEN Alicia | 10% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
37 | BENNETT Olivia | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
38 | ZHENG Linden | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
39 | CHI Sarah | 31% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
40 | PARSONS Leada | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 6% | - |
41 | TIBBETTS Lily | 65% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
42 | MILLER Cassandra | 37% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
43 | LEE Hwaeun | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
44 | DAGLI Saira Veronica | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
45 | HOAGLAND Sally | 15% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.