Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 80% |
| 2 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% |
| 3 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 62% |
| 3 | MUNGUIA Mila | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 42% | 15% | |
| 5 | GAIKWAD Ashmiee | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 6 | CHAN Jolene | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 7 | CHEN Colette | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% | |
| 8 | WONG Natalie | 9% | 37% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 9 | LIN Annika | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
| 10 | LIN Kyleen | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 11 | WANG Jiayi | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 3% |
| 12 | JIANG Evelyn | - | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 13 | SUNG Isabella | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 14 | HAN Emma | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | CHANG Kaitlyn | 1% | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 17 | KANG Ellie | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 18 | NAVARRO LARIOS KATE | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 42% | 16% |
| 19 | LIAO Jieni | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 20 | SHEARER Alena | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 39% | 8% |
| 21 | ZHAO Abbie | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
| 22 | SENGUPTA Jia | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | LIU Hannah | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | TONG Laurie | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | KIM Satie | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | LIN Abbey | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 27 | LIN Elaine | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 28 | RAGHURAMAN Anishka | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | LONG Chloe | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 30 | XU Rachel | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | LIN Ariel | 2% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 32 | KIM Alexia | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | LIU kai yin aria | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | - |
| 34 | CHEN Elaine | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 26% | |
| 35 | CAI Veronica | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 36 | NING Lynn | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
| 37 | TRILLO Maya Izabella | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 38 | STAPLEY Claire | 5% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | KIM Alice | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | KIM Saeren | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | LEE Madeleine | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | LIN Yeeann | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 43 | LONG Jessie | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | JUNG Sienna | 11% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | CHANG Annette | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | MEI Chloe | 56% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | ASPIRAS Avery | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | DANG Madeleine | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ROBBINS Adele | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | WALLIS Allie | 2% | 16% | 45% | 32% | 4% | - | |
| 51 | CAI Joanna | < 1% | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 52 | HENRY Erin | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | KIRBY Skye | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | BACKES Anastasia | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.