Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM Katherine | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% |
2 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 39% | |
3 | LEE Ji Ahn | - | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 40% | |
3 | LUO Ziyue | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
5 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
6 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 2% |
7 | TORRES JIMENA | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
8 | PENG Serena | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
9 | YAO Ada | - | - | 3% | 19% | 49% | 28% | |
10 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
10 | HSU Kaylin | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
12 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
13 | OH Ceana | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
14 | YANG Audrey | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
15 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 46% | 13% |
16 | SUN Emily | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
17 | WANG SIQI | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
18 | ZHUANG Christina | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% | |
19 | KO Claire | - | - | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
20 | SWANSON Alexa | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 1% |
21 | LIN Zhi tong | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 13% | |
22 | FUNG Emma | - | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 22% | |
23 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
24 | DO Leila | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% |
25 | GUAN Sophie | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 2% |
26 | LEE Allison | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 1% |
27 | REN Kayley | - | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 3% |
28 | SHUM Maya | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
29 | YONG Rosalind | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
30 | WYNN Kylie | - | 2% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | - |
31 | CHOI Kailyn | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
32 | WELBORN Calissa | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
33 | FUNG Vera | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 35% |
34 | DENG Melissa | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
35 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
36 | OTEYZA Camille | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
37 | CUI alivia | 3% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
38 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
39 | BOLES Amanda X. | - | - | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
40 | ESTRADA alondra maria | 1% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
41 | YUEN Elsie | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
42 | LAY Apollonia | 4% | 24% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
43 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 13% | 2% |
44 | XIE Su | 15% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
45 | BEAVER Hannah | 1% | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
46 | GUAN Sydney | 14% | 47% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
47 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | - | |
48 | ZHANG Ivy | 3% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
49 | PATTERSON Natalia | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% | - | |
50 | MORALES Paulina | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | - | |
51 | LUH Mia P. | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - |
52 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
53 | HOBSON Ava | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
54 | GUAN Adeline | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
55 | GOEL Riyana | 57% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
56 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
57 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 1% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
58 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
59 | WANG Celine S. | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
60 | WU Chingfei Amber | 31% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
61 | GUO Audrey | 13% | 44% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
62 | LENK Sophie | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - | |
63 | JANEW Anastasia | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
64 | LIU Samantha | 72% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | |
65 | SINGH Sania | 39% | 53% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
66 | LAU Elena | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
67 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | - | |
68 | LIU Jessica | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
69 | CHANG Janelle | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
70 | JACOB Norah | 49% | 47% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
71 | SEN Arjen | 28% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
72 | CANTON Sara | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.