Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TUBALTSEV Evan | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
| 2 | WU Nathan | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% |
| 3 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | - | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 2% | |
| 3 | MOSLEY Wally | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 5 | CHEN Aiden | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 6 | DU Evan | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
| 7 | WONG Kyle | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
| 8 | LIU Aiden | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | DING Max | - | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 10 | YOO Lucas | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
| 11 | BALUCAN Gabriel | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 12 | HUA Nolan | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 13 | MA kevin | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 14 | TENG Eric | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 15 | SHIH Derek | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 16 | LEE Lucas | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | LI Stephen | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 18 | ZHAO Luke | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 19 | GUO Jonathan | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 20 | LIU Alrik SiWei | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 21 | ZHANG Jenson | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | YI Alexander | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | LIU Yihong | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 24 | ENG Kaden | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 8% |
| 25 | FONG Ethan | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 26 | LIU Zihao William | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 27 | JU Shang | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 28 | IM Mason | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 29 | LIU Zeyar | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | CHU Clayton | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 32 | KIM Benjamin | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 33 | YOON Ian | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 34 | MATUSOW Brandon | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 35 | ZHANG William | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | HILU Jonathan | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 37 | HWANG Matthew | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 38 | FU Benjamin | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 39 | LEE Daniel | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | YE Andrew | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | DAI Bo | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 42 | YANG Kevin | 1% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 43 | HONG Eason | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 44 | SHENG Ben | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | YANG Rony | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | GAN Samuel | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.