Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 2 | NGUYEN Siena | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 3 | CHAN Jolene | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 3 | HUANG MADELINE | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
| 5 | YAM Danika | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 6 | GALYEMSKA Viktoriya | 3% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 7 | DANG Kelia | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 8 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 17% | |
| 9 | HU Michelle | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 10 | HUAI Delilah | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 11 | WANG Zidan | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
| 12 | STONE Coral | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 12 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 9% | |
| 14 | XIONG Haojiao | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% | |
| 15 | YAO Rainie | - | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 16 | DUDNICK Morgan | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | GOMES Diana C. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 18 | SCHOEW Margot | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 19 | LEE Lauren | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 20 | LO Chloe | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 20 | TONG Jessie | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 22 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 23 | CHIN Elise | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% | |
| 24 | ZHANG Victoria | - | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 25 | MILLER Sascha | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 26 | HITOMI Nadya | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 27 | ZHAN Sophie | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 28 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 8% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | MUNGUIA Mila | 3% | 29% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | DIECK Miranda P. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 31 | LIU Hannah | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | ZOLLER Noelle | 3% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | SAWANT Asmi | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | GOURNEAU Sophie L. | 6% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 35 | SHEARER Alena | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 36 | TUNG Renee | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 37 | FENG Alicia G. | - | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 38 | WHITESIDES Abigail E. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 39 | HAN Emma | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | MANN Sophia J. | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
| 41 | WANG Jiayi | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | GARZON Vilma | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 43 | TURIANO Nadelle | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | VANKIRK Avery | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | KIM Alice | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | CAI Veronica | 11% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | LIN Abbey | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | KIM Alexia | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | HETTIWATTE Yehansa | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.