Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JIANG Evelyn | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
2 | GAIKWAD Ashmiee | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
3 | KANG Ellie | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
3 | TONG Laurie | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
5 | LIN Elaine | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
6 | RAGHURAMAN Anishka | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
7 | SENGUPTA Jia | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
8 | GONG suri | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | |
9 | LONG Jessie | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
10 | WU Daisy | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 42% | 13% | |
11 | LIU kai yin aria | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
12 | BACKES Anastasia | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
13 | LONG Chloe | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
14 | WONG Natalie | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
15 | CHENG Zijuan "Grace" | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
16 | LIN Ariel | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
17 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
18 | DIMAPILIS JHEAVEN | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
19 | KIM Saeren | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
20 | HU Ashley | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
21 | PARK Chloe | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
22 | CHANG Annette | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
23 | FAN Tina | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 2% | |
24 | BABOLDASHTIAN Rosegol | 1% | 13% | 38% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
25 | CAI Joanna | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
25 | HWANG Charlotte | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
27 | SUNG Isabella | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
28 | VENNE Sophie | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
29 | CHANG Kaitlyn | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
30 | GROSSMAN Elizabeth | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
31 | HWANG Sophie | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
32 | LIQUARD Lea | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
33 | DUDNICK Caitlin | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
34 | CHENG Anna | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
35 | SHEN Elise | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
36 | CAO Kim | 15% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
37 | SAYONE Liliana | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
38 | SUTHERLAND Sadie | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
39 | BI Mia | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
40 | RUSMEVICHIENTONG Lyla | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
41 | DING Jolie | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
42 | SHI Maxine | 16% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
43 | TANG Athena | 31% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
44 | LOMOTAN Audrey | 1% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.