Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% | 
| 2 | FUNG Emma | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% | 
| 3 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | - | 7% | 35% | 43% | 16% | |
| 3 | LUO Ziyue | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% | 
| 5 | DO Leila | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 40% | 11% | 
| 6 | CUI alivia | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | 
| 7 | ZHANG Eunice | - | - | 4% | 28% | 46% | 22% | |
| 8 | XIE Su | 1% | 12% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | 
| 9 | LIN Zhi tong | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% | 
| 10 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 46% | 24% | 
| 11 | YANG Audrey | - | - | - | 7% | 35% | 43% | 15% | 
| 12 | BOLES Amanda X. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | 
| 13 | DENG Melissa | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 31% | 6% | 
| 13 | PENG Serena | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 4% | 
| 15 | SHUM Maya | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% | 
| 16 | ZHUANG Christina | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 17 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 
| 17 | FUNG Vera | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% | 
| 19 | LENK Sophie | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 20 | REN Kayley | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 12% | - | 
| 21 | BAE Yooju | - | 1% | 22% | 46% | 26% | 5% | - | 
| 22 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | 
| 23 | HSU Kaylin | - | - | 4% | 27% | 46% | 23% | |
| 24 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% | |
| 25 | SUN Emily | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 1% | 
| 26 | KO Claire | - | - | 4% | 25% | 44% | 23% | 4% | 
| 27 | WYNN Kylie | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% | 
| 28 | HO Addison | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 6% | 
| 29 | SWANSON Alexa | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 
| 30 | OH Ceana | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 31 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - | 
| 32 | LIU Samantha | 17% | 45% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - | 
| 33 | YAO Ada | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 46% | 23% | 
| 34 | ZHANG Ivy | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 3% | 
| 35 | WANG Emma | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - | 
| 36 | WANG SIQI | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 37 | LEE Allison | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 38 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 1% | 
| 39 | WU Nicole Moxuan | 1% | 14% | 38% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | 
| 40 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | 
| 41 | YUEN Elsie | - | 1% | 17% | 53% | 24% | 4% | - | 
| 42 | CAMPOS Camila | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - | 
| 43 | ZHENG Zoe | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | 
| 44 | KIM Sydney | - | 4% | 39% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | 
| 45 | GUO Audrey | 18% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - | 
| 46 | LI Joy | 10% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | TAO Ann | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | WANG Celine S. | 1% | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | |
| 48 | HOBSON Ava | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 50 | JACOB Norah | 57% | 40% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | - | - | < 1% | 5% | 27% | 47% | 20% | 
| 52 | LUH Mia P. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% | 
| 53 | ANDONIAN Lauren | 6% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | 
| 53 | CHANG Janelle | 10% | 60% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | 
| 55 | GOEL Riyana | 6% | 38% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | - | 
| 56 | YONG Rosalind | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | LIU Jessica | 31% | 58% | 10% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | GUAN Adeline | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | 
| 58 | WU Chingfei Amber | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - | 
| 60 | MONAT Jennifer | 1% | 22% | 57% | 19% | 2% | - | - | 
| 61 | LAY Apollonia | 1% | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | 
| 62 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | 17% | 46% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - | 
| 63 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 3% | 20% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | 
| 64 | SEN Arjen | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - | 
| 65 | MILES Quinn | 67% | 31% | 2% | - | - | - | - | 
| 66 | MORALES Paulina | < 1% | 9% | 52% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 67 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - | 
| 68 | LEE LAUREN | 79% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - | 
| 69 | CHU Felicity | 50% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - | 
| 70 | MA Emily(Yiming) | 59% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 71 | LAU Elena | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - | 
| 72 | SINGH Sania | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - | 
| 72 | BUI Aubrie | 25% | 67% | 8% | - | - | - | - | 
| 74 | IDANAWANG Josephine | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - | 
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.