Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
| 2 | SOWERS Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 3 | HAO Anwen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 3 | BARRIOS Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
| 5 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 16% |
| 6 | YAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 49% |
| 7 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 8 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% |
| 9 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 10 | ERMAKOV Semeon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 11 | BYON Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 28% |
| 11 | TOLEDO Carlos | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% |
| 14 | WANG Zhuoyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
| 15 | KIM ELIJAH | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 41% |
| 16 | PASTORE LIU Vince | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 17 | JOO Jeein | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 18 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% |
| 19 | WANG HongXi | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 20 | LESUEUR Luke J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
| 21 | LI Yiwei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 22 | LI Howard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 50% | |
| 23 | CHOW William T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 24% | |
| 24 | COOK Cole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 33% |
| 25 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 41% | 7% |
| 26 | ZENG Vito | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 27 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 27 | CAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% | 1% |
| 29 | KANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 30 | WONG Lucas | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 32 | RADJABLI Maximillian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 33 | FOX Gavin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 15% |
| 34 | HERRERA aragon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 35 | ZHOU William | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 36 | CHABENAT Guillaume | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
| 37 | CHAN Henry | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | FERGUSON Constantine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 6% |
| 40 | SUNG Julian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 41 | HRISTOV Kris | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 42 | CHAN Elliott | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 44 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 45 | NGO Maximus | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 45 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | 2% |
| 47 | RONG Jasper | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 48 | KOVACHEV Martin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 49 | COBIAN Richard | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 50 | CHI Everett | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | VOSPER James | 100% | 83% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 52 | YU Casey | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | SLIGAR Jackson | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 54 | HO Anson | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 55 | CHEN Lohen | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 55 | YU Kevin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 57 | OLARIO Raphael | 100% | 77% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | PATRICO Peter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 59 | LI Yidong A. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 60 | LEIGH Edward | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 61 | HSIEH Christian | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | ROSALES Vincent | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 63 | WINTERSET Mason | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | TANI Tino | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 65 | EKAMBARAM Nikhil | 100% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | TAN Ryan | 100% | 83% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | LIU Yijin | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 68 | HONG Aidan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 69 | SU Kingston | 100% | 96% | 70% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
| 70 | JOUFFLINEAU Yohann | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 71 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 72 | ANUMULA Aryan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 73 | LI linze | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 74 | ORLIN Edward | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 75 | IYER Neil | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 76 | HONG Arick | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 77 | VO Landon | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 78 | SHA Walter | 100% | 91% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 79 | SEELMAN Cole | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 80 | XU James | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | SINGHAL Armaan | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | WALKER Jack | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 83 | TIAN Zimo | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 84 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 85 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 86 | JIA Samuel | 100% | 69% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 86 | JIA David | 100% | 73% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 88 | ROJAS Alejandro Joaquin | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 88 | WONG David | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 90 | ASPIRAS Piers | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.