Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WU Silin | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 29% | 3% | |
2 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
3 | KIM Liam | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
3 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 8% |
5 | LEE Joshua | 2% | 14% | 38% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
6 | CREMEL Remi | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
7 | YANG Steve | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 26% |
8 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
9 | WANG Waylon | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
10 | MURDOCK Koichi | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% | 1% | |
11 | JEON Joohun | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 18% |
12 | CHANG Colton | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 72% | |
13 | EVANS Desmond | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
14 | WANG Eason | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
15 | SUN Roy | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
16 | TURBAT Travis | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
17 | XU Ethan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
18 | LIU Michael | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
19 | LIN George | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
20 | SHENOY sean | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
21 | TAN Benjamin | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
22 | FOO Kingston | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 2% | |
23 | HUANG Owen | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
24 | PARK Kaiden | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 16% |
25 | HO Cameron | 25% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
26 | CHEUNG RYAN | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 11% | |
27 | NGUYEN Norris | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
28 | LI Aaron | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
29 | LI Jonathan | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
30 | CHEN Solomon | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
31 | MENG Andy | 29% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
32 | SHENOY Neil | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
33 | MANANSALA Caleb | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
34 | MA Justin | 18% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
34 | XU Leo | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
36 | CHANG Matthew | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 33% | 7% | |
37 | DULAI Hukam | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
38 | MENG Eric | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 41% | 15% | |
39 | YIN Luke | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
40 | KAJITA Grayson | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
41 | ZHANG Bosen | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
42 | CAO Benjamin | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% |
43 | ZUO Thomas | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | |
44 | ANDERSON Stellan | 1% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
45 | NGO Lincoln | < 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.