Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% |
| 2 | LEE Ji Ahn | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 3 | FUNG Vera | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 38% | 22% |
| 3 | KO Claire | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 5 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 6 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 7 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
| 8 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | < 1% | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 9 | YAO Ada | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 5% |
| 10 | LIN Zhi tong | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
| 11 | ZHUANG Christina | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 12 | SUN Emily | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 13 | MING YUE | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 14 | WANG Celine S. | 8% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 15 | ZHANG Eunice | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% | |
| 16 | DO Leila | < 1% | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 17 | WANG SIQI | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 18 | FUNG Emma | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 19 | YANG Audrey | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 20 | LUH Mia P. | 3% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 21 | OH Ceana | - | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | BEAVER Hannah | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 24 | SWANSON Alexa | - | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | HOBSON Ava | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | LEE Allison | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | BOLES Amanda X. | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 28 | XIE Su | 23% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | HO Addison | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | LI Jiahua | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | CHOI Kailyn | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 32 | WELBORN Calissa | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | SAIFEE Lamya | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 34 | PENG Serena | - | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 35 | ZHENG Zoe | 9% | 42% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | CHANG Janelle | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 37 | GUAN Adeline | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | REN Kayley | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | PATTERSON Natalia | 3% | 35% | 40% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | BALCE Cyril | 72% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.