Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 2 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
| 3 | MANN Sophia J. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 50% | 23% |
| 3 | DANG Kelia | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 5 | GALYEMSKA Viktoriya | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 6 | FANG Victoria W. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% |
| 7 | YAO Rainie | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 8 | ZOLLER Noelle | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 4% |
| 9 | YAM Danika | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% |
| 10 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 46% |
| 11 | XIONG Haojiao | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 12 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 13 | STONE Coral | - | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 14 | MILLER Sascha | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 15 | DUDNICK Morgan | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | GOMES Diana C. | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 10% | |
| 17 | CHAN Jolene | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% |
| 18 | WANG Jiayi | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | DIECK Miranda P. | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | |
| 20 | JEFFORDS Sophia | - | 4% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | |
| 21 | LEE Lauren | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 22 | MUNGUIA Mila | - | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | FENG Alicia G. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | RAMOS Katrione Dominae | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 25 | AMELANG Raquel | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | GOLOVITSER Maya | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 27 | SUNG Isabella | - | 5% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 28 | TURIANO Nadelle | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LIN Elaine | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | LIN Annika | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | SHEARER Alena | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
| 32 | VANKIRK Avery | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | WANG Zidan | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 34 | LEE Madeleine | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | PHAN Genevieve | 46% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 36 | CHEN Elaine | - | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | CAI Veronica | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 38 | HAN Emma | 13% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | CHEN Colette | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 40 | LOMOTAN Addison | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 41 | KIM Alice | 55% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | LIN Abbey | 4% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | LIU Hannah | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | REGANTI Sitara | 2% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | MORALES Paulina | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 46 | KIM Satie | 14% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | KIM Alexia | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | KIRBY Skye | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 49 | BAIRD Kaleah | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | SAWANT Asmi | 3% | 28% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | JUNG Sienna | 17% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | QURESHI Alesha | 79% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | DANG Madeleine | 25% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | JENSEN Katrina | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | HENRY Erin | 71% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.