Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 81% |
2 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
3 | FENG Alicia G. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
3 | JIANG Evelyn | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
5 | LIN Elaine | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
6 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 40% | |
7 | CHEN Colette | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 46% | 20% | |
8 | LIU kai yin aria | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
9 | SHEARER Alena | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
10 | MUNGUIA Mila | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | ||
11 | WANG Jiayi | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | ||
12 | KIM Alexia | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
13 | LIU Hannah | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
14 | HAN Emma | 2% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
15 | LIN Annika | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
16 | LIAO Jieni | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
17 | LEE Madeleine | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
18 | YUEN Nicole | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
19 | CHEN Elaine | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
20 | DANG Madeleine | 2% | 17% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
21 | CAI Veronica | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
22 | LONG Chloe | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | - |
23 | KIM Satie | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
24 | JOHNSON Heaven | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
25 | YU Stella | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
26 | YU Skylar | 1% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
27 | NING Lynn | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | ||
28 | OCA Merci | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
29 | HSIEH Lucia | 7% | 39% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
30 | ZHANG JADY | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
31 | KIM Saeren | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | ||
32 | CHANG Kaitlyn | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
33 | LIN Ariel | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
34 | LONG Jessie | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | ||
35 | CAMACHO Keila | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
36 | XU Rachel | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - | |
37 | KIM Alice | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
38 | KIM Yeju | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
38 | KIRBY Skye | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
40 | CAI Joanna | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
41 | MEI Chloe | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
42 | PANCHAL Arya | 2% | 16% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
43 | WELCH Greta | 1% | 12% | 38% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
43 | HENRY Erin | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
45 | WALLIS Allie | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.