Birmingham Fencing Club - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZOU Yuming | - | 1% | 10% | 50% | 38% | 1% | |
2 | WANG Brayden | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 3% |
3 | WILLIAMS Kenneth H. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 2% | |
3 | DELAP Rylan Q. | - | - | - | 7% | 37% | 56% | |
5 | DING Tommy | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
6 | WONG Garrick G. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
7 | LI Sophia M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
8 | MARISI Gianna | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
9 | VAUGHAN Norah | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
10 | LIN Ju-An Adrianne | - | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
11 | MITCHELL Henry | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
12 | PHELPS Victor E. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
13 | BROWN Lily | 9% | 43% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
14 | TAN Isabella | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
15 | BRIDGES Camille | 8% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 2% | - | |
16 | MARISI Gabriel | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
17 | DERRINGER Casey | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
18 | PARISH Levi | 50% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
19 | SU Daniel | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
20 | KENNEDY Benjamin | 1% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.